Bonus Gallery: The Evolution Of The Ssangyong Korando

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Since Mahindra doesn’t seem to be giving its self-destructed US distribution channel much attention, we couldn’t help but wonder what exactly is more important to the Indian firm than a little PR the world’s second [sigh] largest car market in the world. The answer, of course, is its acquisition of Ssangyong, a South Korean automaker known only to Americans as the maker of the legendarily ugly Rodius (to be fair, regular TTAC readers may also recall Ssangyong’s bid for world’s ugliest bankruptcy declaration). But the meeting point between Ssangyong and Mahindra isn’t styling, it’s diesel and four-wheel-drive.

Despite the fact that Ssangyong is still technically in receivership, there are still 25 dealers selling its products in Australia on the strength of the motto “We Live Diesel,” while Mahindra has 40 diesel-only Australian dealers. Recently Ssangyong revived the nameplate given to its original product, Korando, for a new model that reportedly launches in Australia later this year. Looking at the evolution of the Korando, from original CJ7 clone to the forthcoming model (which reportedly boasts a 174 hp, 337 lb-ft “German-designed” diesel engine, and available FWD or AWD), one can’t help but wonder where Mahindra sees itself going.

The second generation Korando (1996) was styled by the same guy who penned the Rodius. And thus, the awkward years began.

The Korando was updated in 2001. It didn’t help much.

The Mk II Korando is still built by TagAz for the Russian market. Evolution, as you can see has slowed to a crawl.

Ssangyong broke with its Korando roots by replacing the model in 2006 with this monstrosity, known as the Actyon. The trends at Ssangyong towards car-based baby utes, horrendous styling, and ultimately, bankruptcy, were clear by now.

And for good measure, here’s its cousin, the Actyon Sports.

With the exception of the show-car grille and lights, this is said to represent the new Korando that Ssangyong hopes will save its skin. In fact, Mahindra has just announced it will build this and possibly other Ssangyong models in India. And so the evolution of the Korando, from ruggedly handsome to awkwardly geeky to utterly lost, has come full circle to blandly handsome. Or at least that’s the plan…

Ssangyong’s present is still quite uncertain, as evidenced by its malfunctioning website and still-hideous product line. The next new Korando will help break Ssangyong’s rep for eye-watering styling, but it’s not as if mature markets like Australia and the US are desperate for more varieties of generic-looking crossover. Here’s hoping Mahindra keeps to its rugged roots better than Ssangyong did,

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Niky Niky on Aug 27, 2010

    No wonder the Kyron drives so nicely. Not a great steer, but it feels solid and the door slams are pretty good. Too bad the styling is just plain frumpy.

  • Geggamoya Geggamoya on Aug 28, 2010

    Russian ski-tourists used to drive Ssangyong Mussos around here.. Looked like a cheap Pajero. Now they drive Land Cruisers, Lexi and Range Rovers. I've seen a Rodius live once in Scotland, it was even more hideous than in pictures if even that's possible.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next