UK: Speed Camera Ticketing Slowed Advance in Road Safety

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The TaxPayers’ Alliance and Drivers’ Alliance last week calculated that UK speed cameras issued £87,368,227 (US $131,256,380) worth of tickets in fiscal 2009 without any demonstrable safety benefit. Since speed cameras were first installed on British roads in 1991, the roads became more dangerous than they would have been without photo enforcement, according to the report.

“The road casualty rate has declined at a slower rate since speed cameras were introduced in the early 1990s,” the study explained. “Using the road casualty rate from 1978-1990 it can be estimated that 1,555,244 more road casualties have occurred from 1991-2007 than would have if the 1978-1990 trend had continued.”

Such figures should see a continuous steady decline because advances in automotive technology including anti-lock brakes, stability control, crumple zones and airbags have made vehicles significantly safer over time. Those who are injured in an accident are also more likely to survive as medical treatments and trauma care likewise advance.

In terms of the number of fatal accidents per billion passenger miles traveled, the casualty rate fell from 773 in 1979 to 331 in 2007. The pre-camera fall, however, was far more impressive. Had cameras never been installed, the group projected the casualty rate would have been 128 in 2007.

Automated ticketing machines in the UK are operated by speed camera partnerships representing local city and county officials teaming up with police. Beginning in 2007, the revenue generated by each partnership was sent directly to the national treasury with money reallocated back to the partnership through road safety grants. This setup was designed to remove the impression that the cameras were merely being used to raise revenue. Newly elected Prime Minister David Cameron now pledges to stop grants for the purposes of adding new fixed speed cameras.

This was the first count of tickets that included magistrates’ courts along with the national figures. Partnerships in England and Wales accounted for the greatest number of tickets — £65,748,850 (US $98,721,524). Another pound;19,214,594 (US $28,850,691) went through magistrates courts in England and Wales. Scotland issued £1,641,630 (US $2,464,905) in automated citations while Northern Ireland collected £763,153 (US $1,145,909).

View a copy of the report in a 200k PDF file at the source link below.

Research Notes No. 3 — speeding fines (TaxPayers Alliance and Drivers Alliance, 7/12/2010)

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 19 comments
  • Grifonik Grifonik on Jul 12, 2010

    Money people. It is all about money. Change the penalty to community service and would the cameras exist? Probably not. All this "safety argument" is really just spin. Everyone will argue one way or the other (just like politics) over the non-issue (safety) while they cotinue to suck money out of the population.

  • Dr Strangelove Dr Strangelove on Jul 12, 2010

    The y axis reads "casualties per passenger kilometre". WTF - so there are several hundred people killed for each passenger traveling 1 km? Sounds more like the charge of the light brigade than road traffic. Also, “Using the road casualty rate from 1978-1990 it can be estimated that 1,555,244 more road casualties have occurred from 1991-2007 than would have if the 1978-1990 trend had continued.” WTF again - 1.5 million incremental casualties? There is some serious innumeracy here. Several aspiring journalists should have gone to school a little longer.

    • See 1 previous
    • Dr Strangelove Dr Strangelove on Jul 19, 2010

      The death toll on British roads is something like 3000 per year, which adjusted for population is similar to most countries that actually school their new drivers (coupla years back UK had actually the lowest numbers, don't know if that still applies). So it's all hopeless nonsense.

  • Jalop1991 is this anything like a cheap high end German car?
  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
Next