German Water Torture: Stringing Opel Along

by Bertel Schmitt

Published: June 4th, 2010

german water torture stringing opel along

If anybody would offer me Nick Reilly’s job, I would scream. I don’t have the nerves the assignment takes. Yesterday, Opel made headlines for losing 51.5 percent in May. In today’s mass publication BILD Zeitung, there is even worse news:

“The decision about government aid for the ailing car manufacturer Opel has been delayed until the coming week.”

A meeting of the steering committee that was planned for today could not take place due to “scheduling difficulties.” A new meeting will “expectedly” take place in the coming week. Another committee (there is no shortage of committees in Berlin, only commitment is in short supply) had similar scheduling problems end of May.

According to Der Spiegel, “indications are mounting that the committee will deny aid.” They have an expert opinion from PriceWaterhouseCoopers that says that “General Motors has free liquidity between $16b and $17b.”

Message to GM: “Help yourself, or god help you.”

Whatever the commitment lacking committees may decide: The last word has Germany’s Economics Minister Brüderle. He’s a declared skeptic.

The true and final decision will be made by Brüderle’s boss, German Chancellor Angela Merkel. If politically expedient, she’ll approve the money. If not, she’ll use it for something else. The twentysomethingthousand lost jobs faze nobody. Germany has 3,242,000 jobless, 165,000 less than in the previous month. The sky won’t fall if Opel closes. Given the incredibly shrinking German car market, a little bloodletting may even help the German patient. Especially if the blood is spilled by an American company that had snubbed the Chancellor. Who drives a Golf at home.

There is no easier way to help the German car industry than to turn off Opel’s air supply. Totally EU compliant. No state aid to nobodoy. No sleazy job guarantees.

That “If Mrs. Merkel declines help, we will pay for it ourselves. Maybe this will make your chancellor happy” could haunt Whitacre. I bet it haunts Reilly every night and day.

#BertelSchmitt #Brüdele #Germany #GM #GovernmentAid #Opel

Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 5 comments

Mhadi on Jun 04, 2010

Well done. At least GM cannot bully the German and Swedish governments the way they did with the Canadian government, which is spineless and just looks towards the U.S. for guidance. No tax-payer subsidies to a bankrupt company. Germans will not stand for it.

Like Reply
- SCE to AUX on Jun 04, 2010
  
  +1
  
  Like
Tricky Dicky on Jun 05, 2010

So what's the most likely scenario then?: 1) Opel don't get the money and go out of business OR 2) Opel don't get the money from any EU governments and GM has to do their best to fund them out of the available liquidity, meaning that Opel won't be able to reduce it's cost base as quickly as they would like, or to develop the desired new products in the optimal timeframes and consequently, bleed a little more market share/ fail to deliver proft in the medium term Not sure....

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)