France, Russia Considering Swapping Stakes In State-Owned Automakers

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

You take some of my rescued state-owned automaker, and I’ll take some of yours. That seems to be the cunning plan cooked up by presidents Putin and Sarkozy, as the two face the prospect of rescuing struggling firms in the midst of a weak European market. And actually, it seems that the idea was really Putin’s. French-owned automaker Renault is “more than happy” with its 25 percent stake in the moribund Russian automaker AvtoVAZ, reports Bloomberg, but Russia is offering to buy 15 percent of the French firm if France in turn takes on more AvtoVAZ equity. Considering that Reanult paid $1b for 25 percent of a firm that has been kept alive only by government intervention, a closer embrace of VAZ does not seem advisable. Nor, frankly, does any form of “Franco-Russian Leyland” sound like a good idea.

But Putin knows VAZ needs platforms for future cars to compete with the Western automakers building high-quality cars in Eastern Europe. He tell ITAR-TASS

We very much hope that Renault and we will go further and a new platform for five car models will materialize. You can have no doubts you will have support from the government of Russia.

Russian banks tried hard to snag Opel from that other state-owned automaker, GM, in hopes of accessing competitive vehicle architectures like the Epsilon II and Delta II midsized and compact platforms. Because that deal fell through largely due to concerns over intellectual property protections in Russia, Putin is also moving to allay potential Renault concerns over just handing a platform over in exchange for equity in a problematic firm. He speaks to the concern in People’s Daily, saying

To steal a delicious piece of technology from an owner’s table and consume it under the blanket — we don’t have such a practice in the Russian Federation. Are there any victims due to technology transferring? Just point me out to them. Everything is for sale. Modern technology is a commodity

Which is why Putin’s Lada has an Opel engine. Perhaps a better argument would have been that state-owned automakers are a commodity.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • L'avventura L'avventura on Jun 30, 2010

    As a Russian friend once told me, 'no self-respecting Russian will do business with another Russian"... With that said, Russia hold a huge market potential, however, the risks associated with that market are large. We have large currency fluctuation, political instability, and huge risk of unnecessary government intervention. Politics is business and business is politics. It serves as bad economics. However, one, and possibly the only way to succeed in Russia is by doing business with Putin and his crew. As Gump once said, 'you never know what you're going to get'...

  • Coligny Coligny on Jul 01, 2010

    I'm quite sure Medvedev is President of the Russian federation and Putin its Prime Minister...

  • TheEndlessEnigma Of course they should unionize. US based automotive production component production and auto assembly plants with unionized memberships produce the highest quality products in the automotive sector. Just look at the high quality products produced by GM, Ford and Chrysler!
  • Redapple2 Got cha. No big.
  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
Next