Subaru 360 Vintage Ads: Cheap, Ugly Ads With Sexy Girl Extolling Cheap, Ugly Cars

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Only in 1969: Cheap and crappy production values, mispronounced name of the car you’re selling, which was a cheap and ugly wart. All redeemed by the girl in bell bottoms. Sort of.

If you survived that, don’t miss this longer film extolling the remarkable virtues of Subaru’s 1969 lineup, including the legendary 360 Super Sport (!) with wild racing and crazy over steer footage. Also the pickup, van, and introducing the new FWD Star. Late sixties history is so…scary, especially when you lived through this yourself. (Note: the first minute is very dull, but hang in there, it gets better and better)

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • BuzzDog BuzzDog on May 07, 2010

    Some have mentioned Consumer Reports' rating of "Not Acceptable" for the 360 in its April, 1969 issue; I found this pdf of the article at this site. Interestingly, vehicles weighing under 1,000 pounds (450 kg) were exempt from Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards of the time. The 360 weighed in at just seven pounds (three kg) below this limit. Thus, no dual braking system, minimum bumper height, headrests, collapsible steering column, effective wipers and defroster or even flat instrument panel knobs. I seem to recall reading that at least one state tried to outlaw the sale and registration of this vehicle. Despite its reputation as a deathtrap, I'd still love to own one to tool around the neighborhood, even after reading about the detailed 1,200-mile break-in ritual described in the Consumer Reports article.

  • Stevenmm Stevenmm on May 29, 2012

    Just to show that any car, regardless of it's virtues (or lack thereof) will find a following, I invite you to take a look at this page from my website... http://mysubaru360.com/photos/ I can assure you that there's nothing like parking a 360 next to a Ferrari at a car show. Guess who draws the bigger crowd? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KzI6RgIiT4 Best, Steve

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next