New Mexico: City Expands Traffic Cameras Despite Accident Increase

by The Newspaper

Published: May 12th, 2010

new mexico city expands traffic cameras despite accident increase

The Las Cruces, New Mexico city council voted Monday to partially obey a New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) to remove red light cameras and speed cameras from the state right-of-way by May 18. State officials are concerned with the negative impact that the devices have on safety, but Las Cruces officials emphasized the need to “work around” the state in expanding the red light camera program even though the city has seen an increase in accidents where photo enforcement has been installed.

“I don’t think we want to go to court with DOT commissioners over the red light cameras at Solano and Main,” City Councilor Dolores Connor said. “I guess we need to abide with their rules and move off of that location.”

Currently, Redflex runs the dual speed and red light cameras at four locations. The council agreed to ask Redflex Traffic Systems, the Australian company that owns and operates the cameras, to deactivate the intersection of Main Street and Solano Drive. Although NMDOT ordered cameras down at the lucrative Valley Drive and Avenida de Mesilla intersection, Las Cruces will only take one of them down, claiming that a second device is located within the city’s jurisdiction. It will also add mobile speed camera vans to increase the number of citations issued citywide.

The safety results do not appear to provide a basis for expansion. Comparing a year’s worth of data before the devices were installed at three intersections to a year after, the number of collisions increased 13 percent from 53 to 60. The largest increase was in property damage accidents while injury collisions did not reduce significantly. The numbers would have looked even worse had the city included results from the intersection of Lohman and Telshor where officials claimed “construction” caused the significant increase in accidents. On the other hand, the city finance department estimated that the cameras would generate $5,012,847 in revenue through fiscal 2011.

Although most of the city council supports photo enforcement, Redflex has lost so many camera contracts this year that it would likely exercise its contract to prevent the city from ending the camera program entirely.

“We are very interested in working with the city,” Redflex account director Bob Warner said. “If the city were to take the position that they would not want to continue with the cameras, that would have to be something our executive committee would have to take a look at.”

[Courtesy: TheNewspaper.com]

#Crime&Punishment #Government #RedLightCamera #Redflex #Safety #Traffic

The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 12 comments

Carlisimo on May 12, 2010

As usual, the information that could potentially justify the cameras is left out. I don’t like red-light cameras and I hope the data shows they don’t work, but it isn’t enough to just say “injury accidents did not reduce significantly.” Most injury reports are probably minor whiplash from rear-enders, which are expected to increase at intersections with cameras. So how about side-impact crashes and major injuries or deaths? THOSE are the stats that will make or break red-light cameras. There’s no strong case against them without that information.

Like Reply
Lumbergh21 on May 12, 2010

And, people wonder why some of us don't trust the government to have our best interests at heart.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
Buickman more likely Dunfast.
Chris P Bacon "Dealership". Are these traditional franchised dealers, or is Vinfast selling direct?
Chris P Bacon Full self driving is a fraud. Even aircraft "autopilot" requires pilot interaction, attention, and most importantly of all, training is required. We've already seen accidents by idiots who think they don't need to interact with their Tesla. The system gets confused by simple lane markings, and there are many more variables driving down the street than there is in a jet aircraft.
ToolGuy I read through the Tesla presentation deck last night and here is my take (understanding that it was late and I ain't too bright):• Tesla has realized it has a capital outlay issue and has put the 'unboxed' process in new facilities on hold and will focus on a 'hybrid' approach cranking out more product from the existing facilities without as much cost reduction but saving on the capital.They still plan to go 'all the way' (maximum cost reduction) with the robo thing but that will be in the future when presumably more cash is freed up.