Europe In April 2010: Down 7.4 Percent

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association ACEA released sales numbers for April. As predicted on Friday, the numbers are bad. For the first time this year, and for the first time in 10 months, numbers are negative. New passenger car registrations in Europe fell by 7.4 percent in April compared to the same month last year. They will get worse.

Percentage-wise, the decline in April registrations is a by-product of the cash for clunkers upturn last year. Led by Germany, more and more countries jumped on the bandwagon, with considerable effect (see chart.) More and more European countries have either ended or are phasing out the incentives for putting aging cars out of their misery.

It had been widely expected that sales will be down in 2010 compared to the government-enhanced numbers of 2009. For the rest of 2010, the negative numbers will get higher and higher, as we are comparing to a higher and higher base.

More disconcerting is the fact that for the first 4 months, EU car sales are already 11.6 percent below pre-crisis levels in the same period of 2008. Also, some markets still have scrapping programs, or show the decaying effect of just terminated programs. Once all of Europe has been weaned off the clunker steroids, the market will look miserable for quite some while.

With the drug highs mostly gone, a bleak new normalcy is setting in. In April, Germany was again Europe’s largest market with 259,414 units, despite new registrations falling by 31.7 percent. #2 on the podium: France. Italy.

By manufacturer in the 27 countries of the EU, the Volkswagen Group remains the unassailable leader with a 22 percent market share. PSA Group is in second position with a 13.9 percent market share, followed by Renault Group with a 10.5 percent share. Ford is 4th with a 9.4 percent share.

Speaking of Ford, there most likely are huge regrets in Cologne for embarking on the silly “largest brand in Europe” PR gamble. It’s coming to haunt them. In the EU 27, the Ford brand is now in 4th position after Volkswagen, Renault and Peugeot. On a brand level, Ford lost 19.6 percent in the EU 27, nearly three points more than the 17 percent they had (not really) admitted on Friday, for a Europe 19 that doesn’t exist. If they wouldn’t have made outrageous claims, this would have fallen under the table. Toyota (-21.3 percent), Suzuki (-26.3 percent) and Honda (-28.1 percent) have worse numbers. A much better PR strategy for Ford would have been to tout their #4 ranking as a manufacturer, a respectable showing. What helped the Ford Group was a surprising 35.2 percent rise in Volvo registrations all over Europe. Volvo still belongs to and counts for Ford until the deal with Geely closes. Without Volvo, Ford would be in the #7 slot on a group level, behind GM and Fiat.

Detailed numbers are available as PDF and in Excel format for your number crunching pleasure.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next