What's Wrong With This Picture: Guess The Brand Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Who built this luxury-car concept, shown at the Beijing the Auto Show? It’s not a brand that is well-known in America, but that’s not the only reason you might be left guessing…



That’s right, it’s a Citroen. Inspired by the success of German brands in China’s luxury segment (and possibly problems with its taller offerings), this Metropolis Concept was designed in Shanghai as a vision for a French entry in that burgeoning market segment. It also seems more than a little inspired by Jaguar’s stunning new XJ, just as its sister brand’s recent Five By Peugeot Concept seemed to take some cues from Jaguar’s XF. Could Ian Callum be in danger of being wooed away by the French?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Moedaman Moedaman on Apr 30, 2010

    What's wrong with this picture? Why it's a Citroen. A poorly built car that's ugly. But sadly, with Fiat buying into the US market, it's inevitable that other low quality manufacturers will be making a come back. Although, I do admit that this car isn't retardedly ugly like Citroen's were in the 50/60's. And the reason why cars have been losing glass area is so the manufacturer can sell you the $2000 radar/camera system option.

    • Znork Znork on Apr 30, 2010

      I think you need to tick the box next to "glasses".

  • USAFMech USAFMech on Apr 30, 2010

    One clue gave it away. I guessed correctly, just. When I saw the Panamera-aping front fender and the stolen Estoque rear quarters, I very nearly guessed "some unpronouncable Chinese company". But when I looked closely I saw the concave rear window and I knew. There is only one company still using that design detail - Citroen. GIANT O.T. WARNING! What the H*ll happened to the B&B? It's more like a hate-forum for foreign brands since Robert left. No wonder I post once a year anymore.

  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
  • Chris P Bacon "Dealership". Are these traditional franchised dealers, or is Vinfast selling direct?
  • Chris P Bacon Full self driving is a fraud. Even aircraft "autopilot" requires pilot interaction, attention, and most importantly of all, training is required. We've already seen accidents by idiots who think they don't need to interact with their Tesla. The system gets confused by simple lane markings, and there are many more variables driving down the street than there is in a jet aircraft.
  • ToolGuy I read through the Tesla presentation deck last night and here is my take (understanding that it was late and I ain't too bright):• Tesla has realized it has a capital outlay issue and has put the 'unboxed' process in new facilities on hold and will focus on a 'hybrid' approach cranking out more product from the existing facilities without as much cost reduction but saving on the capital.They still plan to go 'all the way' (maximum cost reduction) with the robo thing but that will be in the future when presumably more cash is freed up.
Next