By on April 9, 2010

The LA Times reports that “more than 100 suits seeking class-action status, as well as at least 50 personal injury cases” against Toyota have been consolidated to a single courtroom, under the jurisdiction of U.S. District Judge James Selna. According to Reuters, the ruling by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation did state that:

We are initially persuaded that the centralized proceedings should eventually include the related personal injury and wrongful death actions

The WSJ [sub] describes Selna’s experience in these matters:

His record includes complex corporate cases. Judge Selna presided over a long-running patent infringement case between chipmakers Qualcomm Inc. and Broadcom Corp., ruling in 2008 that Qualcomm had violated an injunction by selling and offering to sell chips containing Broadcom’s patented technologies and failing to pay royalties.

He presided over a case seeking class action status brought by a laptop computer buyer against eMachines, asserting false advertising and other violations of state consumer protection laws. The judge carefully parsed his rulings, finding only some of the claims were actionable.

“Describing a product as ‘quality’ or as having ‘high performance criteria’ are the types of subjective characterizations that Illinois courts have repeatedly held to be mere puffing,” he said in dismissing one of the claims in November 2005.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “California Court Consolidates Toyota Lawsuits...”


  • avatar
    obbop

    Whatever the outcome I rest assured that even if defects are proven to have caused actual harm to one or more consumers that the legal system designed to maximize the wealth of those using that system for their income will ensure the lawyers involved will receive HUGE monetary sums while a pittance is received by those suffering the harm.

    It is the American way and our class-based system and entrenched power structures will have it no other way.

  • avatar
    whynotaztec

    I hope “Breker” is a play on words, like maybe they are in front of Breker Toyota? Oy………….

  • avatar
    GS650G

    A new CVS was being built near me and they had the nerve to NOT hire overpriced Union workers for the construction. They had the same giant rat inflated on the site. Must be standard fare for the UAW and friends.

    Speaks volumes about their leadership.

    For sake of argument lets just say CVS didn’t give a shit and had police remove the union and their giant leader, er I mean inflated rat.

  • avatar
    Robert.Walter

    Is the misspelling of “Breaker” as “Breker” a result of sleeping in continuing-ed class, an attempt at sympathy, or an unintended consequence of the “Deutscherechtschreibreform”?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • C5 is Alive: Except that the ES250 was introduced two model years after the last Cimarron infested Cadillac...
  • Jeff S: @jmo2–Much easier to work on a 70s car than a present day car because there were no computers. As for...
  • Jeff S: @Corey–Thank you looking forward to your piece on the Imperial.
  • NormSV650: Because Lexus offered a similar badge engineered ES250 based off of Camry at the time.
  • JaySeis: I’m totally up for “Back Alley Brawler”, Urban Kombature”, Rurban Rocker”, and the like. This off road crap...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber