Australia: Facebook Page Undermines Covert Speed Camera Effort

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The motoring public in Queensland, Australia has foiled a police effort to deploy “covert” speed cameras across the state. Police have expanded their fleet of unmarked vehicles equipped with automated enforcement devices in an effort to boost the number of citations issued. The idea is to ensnare drivers “anywhere, anytime” by blending in with ordinary vehicle traffic in vehicles as diverse as a Toyota sedan, a Volkswagen Golf, a Mitsubishi Lancer, a Subaru WRX, a Hummer H2, and various types of trucks and SUVs.

“The underpinning philosophy of Queensland’s speed camera program is general deterrence, designed to create the perception in the minds of motorists that speed cameras may be deployed anywhere, anytime,” a police statement explained. “The deterrent effect is fundamentally linked to the random scheduling of speed camera operations — the unpredictability of which is intended to encourage motorists to adopt more responsible driving behavior at all times while on the road.”

Officials call the covert vehicles “Q-Cars” after the heavily armed World War II merchant vessels known as Q-ships that were designed to lure and destroy German U-boats. Although Queensland had an extensive unmarked car program in the 1980s, officials dropped them in 1991. The program was revived at the end of 2009 after a two-month trial of a pair of covert speed camera cars resulted in 1265 citations, including 25 tickets for “undue noise” and tire smoke.

Earlier this month, the Facebook group Police Cars, Gotta catch ’em all began undermining this effort by cataloging each of the covert vehicles as they were spotted on the road. The page has already uncovered a number of tricks employed by police, including driving cars with bumper stickers and student driver emblems intended to fool people into thinking the vehicles are not police cars. The page also caught a Holden Rodeo Speed Camera and other vehicles trying to camouflage themselves on the side of the road.

“I spotted the VZ ute on Compton Road today, sneaky bugger hiding in the trees,” user Brian Lee wrote.

Queensland Police Service officials were not pleased by photographs ( view sampling of photos) being collected on the page.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Bunkie Bunkie on Apr 20, 2010

    Let's ask a question: Are you against these things in residential neighborhoods where people are travelling at dangerous speeds? I'm not. But I am against the use of speeding violations as a means of revenue enhancement. That can, in my opinion, only be fought through the ballot box. If you don't like the government vote them out. In a democracy the electorate has the ultimate responsibility.

  • Contrarian Contrarian on Apr 20, 2010

    Well, almost all of these things are used for revenue enhancement - they're even marketed that way to local jurisdictions. Of course I get as upset as anyone when people speed in places they shouldn't, but I'd rather have traditional law enforcement dealing with it, rather then this Orwellian technology. Recently, on my street the police, as our request, put a speed display unit on the side of the road for a couple of weeks. It really did the job, but having been a year or so ago, we may need to borrow it again for a couple of weeks. They rotate it though our village. BTW, I don't consider that Orwellian because it doesn't mete out punishment, just information that aceives the same goal.

  • SCE to AUX Range only matters if you need more of it - just like towing capacity in trucks.I have a short-range EV and still manage to put 1000 miles/month on it, because the car is perfectly suited to my use case.There is no such thing as one-size-fits all with vehicles.
  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
Next