Who Benefited From Toyota's Woes?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

When Toyota stumbled there were (muted) shouts of glee around the car producing world. “Yay! They fell flat on their face! Let’s pick up the pieces.” Well, nobody said it openly, but action speaks louder than words: Ford and Hyundai revved up their “quality” aspects (wink, wink) GM and Chrysler fired up their incentives (it’s all on the taxpayers, so who cares?) Ford and Hyundai said “to hell with subliminal messages” and followed with the money. Even Nissan couldn’t help themselves and offered a bounty to deserting Toyotaphiles. February came and went and Toyota only registered a 9 percent drop (year on year after the carpocalypse). This was quite confusing. Especially given the fact that production had been halted and dealer stock was quarantined until fixed. Analysts had predicted double digit drops and were surprised themselves. Everyone had expected something out of a George Romero film to happen to Toyota. So, suddenly, this turns into an Agatha Christie story. “Who benefited from Toyota’s stumble”?

From Korea, The Chosun reports: “It wasn’t us!” They say they expected Hyundai-Kia to snap up absconding Toyota customers, but as they put it: “Hyundai and Kia, which were initially expected to be the greatest beneficiaries of Toyota’s woes, saw their sales in the U.S. rise 10 percent in February on-year, less than the 13 percent overall market growth seen that month. The sales results show that the Korean carmakers still need to do more to win over U.S. consumers. Declines in sales at Toyota translated directly into rising sales of similar car models at Ford, Nissan and Chrysler, but not at Hyundai and Kia.”

The Chosun posits that it must be Ford and GM who benefited from Toyota as Ford’s figures shot up 43 percent and GM’s rose 32 percent. But this doesn’t sit well either. As our Lord Niedermeyer reported, Ford’s fleet sale rose 74 percent and GM’s grew 114 percent. This accounts for the majority (but not all) of Ford and GM’s growth. Not to mention GM loaded up on leasing, too. So, now things are extremely hazy. If Hyundai-Kia and Ford didn’t win retail customers over with their quality and GM and Chrysler didn’t woo customers with their incentives, then who did? The most likely candidate would have to be Toyota’s cross town rival, Honda. With the Accord shooting up 41 percent, its close image to Toyota and even Acura growing through its CUV’s, it would seem that they are the main beneficiaries of Toyota’s woes. But until they break out those fleet sales, we can never be sure.

While Toyota has their feet dragged across hot coals in the United States, elsewhere around the world, Toyota’s problems aren’t as bad as they seem. In Australia and Canada, Toyota’s sales have reached record highs. In the UK, Toyota’ sales fell only 5 percent. Which isn’t bad, when you consider that Toyota doesn’t really have a loyal fanbase here, and what is here is fickle and prone to abandon their prior purchase in a heartbeat. Couple this with the facts that Toyota’s incentives were low (in comparison to the competition) for February 2010 and that they plan to ratchet them up for the following months, and you have an interesting next few months ahead. Is it time to start up a “Toyota Deathwatch”? Not yet, let’s see how the next few months go.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Frozenman Frozenman on Mar 07, 2010

    I like to think of myself as a reasonably prudent investor, two weeks ago I took a pass on the new toyota and joined the subaru club instead. For me it's all about the resale and ease of moving on to the next new car when the time comes. If people actually call you when you place your ad for the used whip this can be a good thing.

  • Joe_Gamer Joe_Gamer on Mar 08, 2010

    I own a 2004 Honda Accord, I really love this car(V6 6SPD coupe) but I cannot honestly say that it is reliable or particularly well built. Honda is coasting on their Rep just like Toyota was, got the Accord out after the winter snow and surprise none of my dash lights work anymore, Brakes are made of mush and the front rotors warp so quickly it's insane. Interior is cheap, ABS/TCS control module failed and I'm not forking out $1400 to replace it. Third gear syncros for the 6spd transmission were uh subject of a "Technical Bulletin" which is like a recall that you get to pay for? Anyway(disclaimer: I am not really sure how the process works since I have had no problem with mine, but that is the impression I got from others). Now part of the "Honda Factory Performance" bodykit is falling off(cold broke down the adhesive I think, probably not entirely their fault). Had 76k When I bought it and it is now at 110k. My experience has not been one of reliability, gorgeous looks: yes, decent gas mileage: yes, performance that's fun yet not stupid enough to get in trouble with: yes, Reliable and well built: that's a negative. I expect much better reliability will come from companies like(IMHO) Hyundai, Subaru, or Ford who are still in the process of building a reputation for reliability and have not reached the point of critical mass where actual reliability is subjugated by clever marketing and a reputation that is no longer deserved.

  • Analoggrotto Finally, some real entertainment: the Communists versus the MAGAs. FIGHT!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *IF* i was buying a kia.. (better than a dodge from personal experience) .. it would be this Google > xoavzFHyIQYShould lead to a 2025 Ioniq 5 N pre-REVIEW by Jason Cammisa
  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
Next