Report Warns Of Private Car Repo Dangers

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Private companies that repossess automobiles without the involvement of law enforcement are creating potentially deadly situations, a report released Thursday by the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) warned. The Boston, Massachusetts-based non-profit legal advocacy group examined the consequences of turning car seizures over to private firms, particularly during the recent economic downturn.

“In just the past three years, the publicly reported toll from self-help repossessions is shocking,” John W. Van Alst and Rick Jurgens wrote in the NCLC report. “Six deaths. Dozens of injuries and arrests. Pistols, rifles, shotguns, knives, fists and automobiles wielded as weapons. And, in at least three cases, repo agents towed away automobiles with children under the age of nine inside.”

An estimated 1.9 million repossessions take place each year. In 33 states, no license or background check is required for the companies that repossess cars on behalf of lenders and car dealers. This means convicted felons can, and do, operate repo businesses.

The NCLC report takes issue with the practice of allowing a lender to unilaterally seize a car from its owner for missing a payment without first having a neutral third-party judge or administrative officer verify the claim.

“With the ability to repossess on a whim, dealers and lenders can use repossessions not simply as a means of retaking collateral when a debtor defaults,” the report stated. “Lenders can also use the threat of repossession to intimidate consumers. For example, the prospect of having a car seized can be used to keep a consumer from asserting the right to withhold payment for a warranty violation or other breach of contract in the sale of the car or the right to revoke acceptance of a car with substantial defects.”

The report cited court documents that showed one major repo company forced its agents to work up to 90 hours a week without overtime pay. “Each of you have the ability to do WHATEVER it takes to pick up more cars,” an email sent to employees urged. Those who failed to meet a minimum weekly quota of twenty cars were forced to work longer hours. The pressure to take extreme actions in several cases has resulted in violence both against vehicle owners and the repo men themselves.

NCLC recommended that states adopt laws that require lenders to provide notice and provide car owners with a set period to remedy missed payments. It also recommended that lenders obtain a court order prior to seizing a vehicle. This, the group says, would allow motorists to have the opportunity to have a chance to challenge an improper seizure in a neutral setting. The report also urged that repo companies be licensed to prohibit the hiring of individuals with violent criminal histories.

A copy of the report is available in a 1.4mb PDF file at the source link below.

Repo Madness (National Consumer Law Center, 3/11/2010)

[courtesy: thenewspaper.com]


The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Robert Schwartz Robert Schwartz on Mar 18, 2010

    I have dealt with NCLC professionally before. They publish a very nice series of books on consumer credit law. But, they can get a bit overwrought about legal issues. This is one of them. First, I don't really think that there is big problem of violence in repos. The law is very solicitous of debtors and claims of breach of the peace. No creditor wants to be subject to a breach of the peace claim, because they can be very expensive. I remember the case of the repo man who towed away a car with kids in it. The consensus on my commercial law mailing list was that they were in a whole world of legal hurt. Not to mention possible criminal liability for kidnapping, even if the kids were awake. Second, every time you add a procedural requirement, like going to court before repossession, you are adding a cost. The additional cost will make credit more expensive and harder to get. That is not a good thing for the industry or consumers. I would think that no legislative proposal to do something like that will go very far in the current environment.

  • Skor Skor on Mar 19, 2010

    I've never had a car repo-ed, since I paid cash for most of my cars. From my observation, it seems that repo men fall into two broad categories: The desperate. Thugs. On a bright note, only a tiny percentage of cars get repossessed. The last thing a finance company wants to do is repo a car, since the average loss on a repo ride is $8K to the finance company.

  • Analoggrotto Ford wishes it could be Hyundai Kia Genesis.
  • John I used to have a 2016 Chevy Spark EV (leased, 85 miles range when new) as our family's 3rd car. Loved it. When the lease ended the only cheap EV was the bolt but I couldn't stomach the tuperware interior so I bought a used Cayman instead and have been waiting now for another a cheap EV for almost 5 years. My bigger problem would be that I dislike giving Elon Musk even more $$, but the tesla supercharger network makes long trips (within CA at least) an option.
  • SCE to AUX "...it’s unclear how Ford plans to reach profitability with cheaper vehicles, as it’s slowed investments in new factories and other related areas"Exactly. They need to show us their Gigafactories that will support the high-demand affordable EV volume.
  • 1995 SC I have a "Hooptie" EV. Affordable would be a step up.
  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
Next