S&P Sticks With "Buy" Rating For Toyota Stock
Toyota Sienna boy band, Boyota from Jennifer Vuong on Vimeo.
Standard & Poors Equity Research [via BNET] says you shouldn’t dump that Toyota stock just yet.
Will the aggressive action of cutting production and recalling so many vehicles scare away potential Toyota buyers, or will consumers think the abundantly cautious response shows a commitment to customer care and quality? We think it is too early to tell, but we believe resilience and global growth of vehicle demand will help TM (Toyota Motors)
You know, until mechanics actually start finding malignant hellspawn demons within Toyota electronic throttle control units. In which case you should invest heavily in law firms. Meanwhile, Toyota is apparently hiring shamans to cleanse their new product of metaphysical infestation by way of bizarre voodoo ceremonies like the one shown above [Hat Tip: Vanity Fair Gay Cars blog].
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
Like I wrote yesterday, If Toyota wants to know how not to do this properely, they have Detroit for an example.
I bought Toyota stock yesterday. It, along with Ford, are the buys of the year. Toyota has strong fundamentals as a company. They are swimming in cash, have excellent retention and some of the best reliability in the business. And yes, four people have been killed in something like 2.2 million cars. How many of those 2.2 million killed themselves driving too fast, while drunk or by eating McVomit's food. That number is in the thousands. But the public at large knows nothing of statistical analysis. You are far more likely to be killed walking across the street to your Toyota. As a comparison 254 people died in Jeep Cherokee fire deaths on a similar number of cars. This means you are 51 times more likely to die in a Jeep than a Toyota. Did this cause a hullabaloo in the media? Nope, and I am sure race was part of the reason. http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2009/10/potential-fire-hazard-may-trigger-recall-of-jeep-grand-cherokees.html
Surprised no one comment on the boy band. Only mildy better than the Volt dancers.
S&P is so good at what they do, they had buy ratings on Lehman and Bear Stearns (as well as many other now defunct companies), and AAA+ ratings on bundled residential backed mortgage security CDOs in 2007. In other words, do the opposite of what S&P states, and you'll fare much better statistically. (What does on expect when their business model only generates revenue based on 'buy' ratings, and no revenue on 'sell' ratings).