S&P Sticks With "Buy" Rating For Toyota Stock

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Toyota Sienna boy band, Boyota from Jennifer Vuong on Vimeo.

Standard & Poors Equity Research [via BNET] says you shouldn’t dump that Toyota stock just yet.

Will the aggressive action of cutting production and recalling so many vehicles scare away potential Toyota buyers, or will consumers think the abundantly cautious response shows a commitment to customer care and quality? We think it is too early to tell, but we believe resilience and global growth of vehicle demand will help TM (Toyota Motors)

You know, until mechanics actually start finding malignant hellspawn demons within Toyota electronic throttle control units. In which case you should invest heavily in law firms. Meanwhile, Toyota is apparently hiring shamans to cleanse their new product of metaphysical infestation by way of bizarre voodoo ceremonies like the one shown above [Hat Tip: Vanity Fair Gay Cars blog].


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 18 comments
  • Mfgreen40 Mfgreen40 on Feb 02, 2010

    Like I wrote yesterday, If Toyota wants to know how not to do this properely, they have Detroit for an example.

  • Canucknucklehead Canucknucklehead on Feb 02, 2010

    I bought Toyota stock yesterday. It, along with Ford, are the buys of the year. Toyota has strong fundamentals as a company. They are swimming in cash, have excellent retention and some of the best reliability in the business. And yes, four people have been killed in something like 2.2 million cars. How many of those 2.2 million killed themselves driving too fast, while drunk or by eating McVomit's food. That number is in the thousands. But the public at large knows nothing of statistical analysis. You are far more likely to be killed walking across the street to your Toyota. As a comparison 254 people died in Jeep Cherokee fire deaths on a similar number of cars. This means you are 51 times more likely to die in a Jeep than a Toyota. Did this cause a hullabaloo in the media? Nope, and I am sure race was part of the reason. http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2009/10/potential-fire-hazard-may-trigger-recall-of-jeep-grand-cherokees.html

    • See 2 previous
    • Baldheadeddork Baldheadeddork on Feb 02, 2010

      I own some shares in Ford, and I love bargain stocks, but I'm not buying Toyota yet. This is still a very expensive stock. TM's market cap is over 3x Ford, VW, Nissan and Daimler, and more than twice as large as Honda. They have a weak dividend that's been cut three in three consecutive periods and it's in danger because they're not profitable and this gas pedal recall is going to burn a mountain of cash from their reserves. They have already announced that the weak dollar is going to keep them from making a profit in the US in 2010, and sales in Europe are expected to be much lower than 2009 because of the end of buying incentives. Right now analysts are projecting $3.24 EPS for FY2011 (which doesn't begin until March 2010). I expect the currency valuations and the damage already done by the gas pedal recall is going to cause a substantial downgrade in those estimates, and when they are downgraded the share price is going to follow. I also don't know if the market has priced in the cost of this recall and PR nightmare. TM is trading today at ~$78, which is still above it's average price for the last twelve months. And we still don't know if Toyota has really figured out the cause of the unintended acceleration, or if the shim fix is going to work. If they roll this out and another Camry or Avalon flies off a parking deck or into a lake, the bottom is going to fall out. TM is a falling knife. Try to catch it at your peril.

  • Steven02 Steven02 on Feb 02, 2010

    Surprised no one comment on the boy band. Only mildy better than the Volt dancers.

  • Ohsnapback Ohsnapback on Feb 02, 2010

    S&P is so good at what they do, they had buy ratings on Lehman and Bear Stearns (as well as many other now defunct companies), and AAA+ ratings on bundled residential backed mortgage security CDOs in 2007. In other words, do the opposite of what S&P states, and you'll fare much better statistically. (What does on expect when their business model only generates revenue based on 'buy' ratings, and no revenue on 'sell' ratings).

Next