Jeep Crossing Over To "Broaden Urban Appeal"

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Having re-birthed themselves at the taxpayers’ expense, one of Chrysler’s top priorities is restoring the brand equity that has bled out since the Daimler takeover. First up was the move to spin “Ram” off as its own brand, and now it seems that no-one is safe from “re-birth,” as UPI.com reports that Chrysler are rethinking their strongest brand, Jeep. Unfortunately, one man’s brand rebirth is another man’s brand betrayal. Chrysler want to replace all of Jeep’s products, except for the Wrangler and Grand Cherokee, and the idea is to utilise Fiat’s experience of fuel efficient engines as the basis for it. That means Jeep is likely to become smaller, more fuel-efficient and less off-road capable [ rumors of a Fiat Panda 4×4-based Jeep (rendered above) date back to the earliest days of the Fiat-Chrysler alliance]. If you had to boil the proposed shift into a single word, UPI figures it would be “soft.” And the markets have reacted to this news in pretty much the same way you’ve probably just reacted: they think the idea is bad. Very bad.

“Chrysler has to protect the crown jewel,” Aaron Bragman, research analyst with IHS Global Insight, told the newspaper. “When Jeep sticks to its core values it does well. Jeep has always been a trucky off-road brand and whenever they got away from that it did not go well.” Gerald Myers, professor at the University of Michigan and former chairman of Jeep’s former owner, AMC, was a little less subdued in his reaction, “It’s a huge mistake….I couldn’t think of anything worse for the brand.” Mike Manley, head of the Jeep brand said that the brand is capable of broadening its urban appeal and is aware of the risks, “We don’t want to dilute what Jeep means,” he said. Which is probably what Cadillac brand managers said when they introduced the Cimmarron.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 47 comments
  • Jaje Jaje on Feb 02, 2010

    Again - don't water down your brands' image / niche just to get a few more sales. Protect it, develop it, keep your hardcore customers and not focus on chasing the soccer mom / cubicle commuter Dads current vehicle fashion (it will change), weather the slow sales periods and wait for the booms when your image is again back in style with a stronger image. This is marketing 101 that the car companies simply fail at.

  • INeon INeon on Feb 02, 2010

    The Panda is not watered-down. It(from internet searches-- I'm plain old American) has a wonderful reputation for a minuscule 4x4. Top 10 in Top Gear's survey-- of over 150 automobiles. No other commuter-mileage car is as capable offroad as this Panda. It's been built for 30 years. In America, we call that legendary when it's attached to the Toyoda or Honda brands. Why the bias? The car gets 55mpg with the diesel and 4x4. You're welcome for the cake, and you may begin eating.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brad Kozak Brad Kozak on Feb 02, 2010

      I'm a Wrangler guy. (Used to say "I'm a Jeep guy," but that's like when you're a Conservative, you can't say "I'm a Republican," because "Republican" doesn't stand for anything any more than "Jeep" does.) The Panda may be a great vehicle. But until they deliver something that would look outta place under the Big Top with a bunch of Ringling Bros.' finest pouring out of it, I'll pass. My formula to "Save the Jeeps" is simple: Stop trying to make Jeep all things to all people. Focus, Pinky...FOCUS. Kill the Compass (please!), the Patriot, and the Commander. Return the Liberty to it's "Cute Ute" roots - and sell 'em to women. If you need a vehicle for hybrid/electric/alt. fuels/screwing up the brand - this is the one to sacrifice. Build a two-door and four-door pickup built on the Wrangler Unlimited base - hard top and soft-top, please. Put Diesels in the Wrangler! Hire an ad agency that understands the brand,(maybe people who drive Jeeps, for instance), stand back, and let them recapture the romance of the brand. (MY agency, for instance. Hint, hint; grin, grin; wink, wink; say no more, say no more.) That's about it. And if you wanna do something that would REALLY appeal to off-road guys, cut a deal with Herman Miller and license the Aeron chair technology, and make some seats for the Jeep that ditch cushions for a fabric/frame combo - then put them in a stripped-down Rubicon with no superfluous electronics (electric windows, power locks, etc.). Now THAT would sell.

  • GrumpyOldMan The "Junior" name was good enough for the German DKW in 1959-1963:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DKW_Junior
  • Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
  • Dwford The real crime is not bringing this EV to the US (along with the Jeep Avenger EV)
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis? 🙈
  • SCE to AUX "Hyundai told us that perhaps he or she is a performance enthusiast who is EV hesitant."I'm not so sure. If you're 'EV hesitant', you're not going to jump into a $66k performance car for your first EV experience, especially with its compromised range. Unless this car is purchased as a weekend toy, which perhaps Hyundai is describing.Quite the opposite, I think this car is for a 2nd-time EV buyer (like me*) who understands what they're getting into. Even the Model 3 Performance is a less overt track star.*But since I have no interest in owning a performance car, this one wouldn't be for me. A heavily-discounted standard Ioniq 5 (or 6) would be fine.Tim - When you say the car is longer and wider, is that achieved with cladding changes, or metal (like the Raptor)?
Next