Ford Sharpens Its Edge

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: February 10th, 2010

As our recent compact-ish CUV sales snapshot shows, Ford’s Edge has been losing its edge with consumers. And not to better looking cars with better ideas and more talent, but to its older brand-mate, the Escape. In order to keep up with its country cousin, the Edge has been updated for 2011, to offer a more contemporary corporate look, new powertrains and more. Where once only a 3.5 liter V6 (285 hp) was available, a more powerful 3.7 (305 hp) and the first US application of the EcoBoost 2.0 turbo four-cylinder (no stats released yet) are now optional. Where once the “Sport” trim was barely distinguishable, it now gets 22-inch rims and a blacked-out grille. And where standard models once sported ridiculously cheesy chrome grilles, the new 2011 Ford Edge now has an updated, yet equally giant and cheesy chrome grille. Because you can’t win them all.

#2011FordEdge #Cuv #Edge #Ford #NewCars

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 74 comments

Shaker on Feb 11, 2010

Hopefully, this is an improvement over the 2007 SEL Edge that Consumer Reports trashed. For me, it's a bit too heavy (4500lbs w/3.5V6) to be considered in the same class as the Equinox - closer to a Santa Fe.

Like Reply
Accs on Feb 13, 2010

Hmmmm.. This is a problem that doesn't take rocket science. My wife has a hunger for these things.. but the analytical side of me doesn't understand the point. Ya got the Escape, the Edge, the Flex and the Exploder. Each.. is within 500lbs of each other. Each has a 6cycl. Each can hold 6 pass, with the Flex and the Exploder being made for 8.. if you drop the back seats.. (and sit on the gas tank.) But honestly.. Whats the reason to buy one.. over the other. And I know.. Toyota has the same issue, only that's more compounded. (if one is on recall.. just dump it for one that isn't. -- HAHA) Its getting to the point that the Escape is as big as the last gen Exploder is (forget the comments about model bloat.) Exploder and Flex will be competing DIRECTLY (if only MARKETING from FORD and or the MEDIA could MAKE A PROPER AND CORRECT designation FOR WHAT A SUV v CUV is.) Clue.. one WAS built on the Ranger frame.. then on the F150 frame = SUV = body on frame. Other was built on the S60-80 frame. = CUV = CAR unibody. And the sport package on these things.. has been what it will always be. A tape and badge package.. only now it has a set of wheels and special paint. -- so no real delineation to what SPORT is. Then again.. a vehicle of this heft.. shouldn't SPORT anything.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.