By on February 2, 2010

Opel is running out of time and out of money. In the second quarter of 2010, the company will be out of cash again, figures the German Handelsblatt. As indicated yesterday, discussions with the unions are going nowhere. Says the Handelsblatt:”Management is preparing for a breakdown of the talks.” Reilly and his crew are trying to find ways how to get Opel going without wage concessions by the unions. But how?

GM does not want to contribute any money, said works council members to the Handelsblatt. Remains government help. However, peace with the workers, and a considerable contribution by GM are preconditions for any government help, is the word from Berlin. The relations with the workers are heading towards war. Members of the Opel Supervisory council, such as union leader Armin Schild are against state aid. As long as the unions are battling with Opel management, propping up Opel management with tax payers’ money is no smart political move. Music in the ears of economy minister Brüderle, who also is against pouring money down a black hole. This is going nowhere fast.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

9 Comments on “Opel Going Nowhere Fast...”


  • avatar
    Nutella

    Opel is doomed. The brand doesn’t stand for anything. Kept afloat by huge fleet sales and heavy discounts. Most Opel buyers would rather be seen in a more expensive (and better) VW.
    Ford is much more competitive in Europe.
    The brand is north worth the premium pricing the costs require.
    GM had the opportunity to turn Opel-Saab into the next VW-Audi but miserably failed…again

  • avatar
    cjpistonsfan

    My family lived in Germany for 5 years (1996-2001)while my dad (a ~30 year GM employee) worked on assignment for Opel. I once asked him how Opel could be having financial problems (back then they were, too) when I could see lots Opels on the road literally everywhere I went. His response: “When a company sells a product for less than it costs to make it, that company is going to have financial problems.” Such a simple truth that it is astoundingly little-heeded.

    • 0 avatar
      OldandSlow

      Your dad’s response pretty much sums it up. – and – restructuring will cost money as well. Redundancies/lay-offs don’t come cheap in Europe.

      Does Opel/Vauxhall really need two plants, one in Bochum and another Ellesmere Port to produce the Astra?

  • avatar
    Dr Strangelove

    “GM had the opportunity to turn Opel-Saab into the next VW-Audi but miserably failed…again”

    GM has owned Opel since the second crusade. In the fifties, Opel could sell cars that competed with Mercedes; into the seventies, their standing as a brand was still ahead of VW and Ford. Falling behind these two competitors really shows how poorly they have been managed.

    This disaster has been long in the making; it parallels GM’s slow but thorough decline in North America.

    • 0 avatar
      Facebook User

      Indeed, Strangelove… and both are even more closely related today, of course, as the only halfway decent products Gov’t Motors US can claim are based directly on Opels. Doesn’t bode well for Whitacre & Co.

  • avatar
    Steven02

    In the end, I think the union is stalling. If Opel goes under, they are going to be out of a job. I guess that is ok in Europe, with all the entitlements they like to hand out.

    • 0 avatar
      pnnyj

      The union seems to be operating under the very realistic belief that under GM’s incompetent management Opel will go under regardless of whether they make concessions or not. Unless GM comes up with a solid, legitimate plan for the long term success of Opel or GM sells the company the workers have nothing to gain from making concessions.

      So far all of GM’s various plans for Opel have been merely delaying tactics to avoid bankruptcy for a couple of years using money borrowed from governments. That’s not a plan for long term survival, let alone long term success.

    • 0 avatar
      Steven02

      Opel isn’t being run by the same chiefs anymore. New plans have been proposed. The big part of the plans that the union doesn’t like is the job cuts and concessions (go figure). One must get costs under control for any hope of survival, which is what Opel is proposing (and very similar to the Magna plan the unions were on board with).

      The plans for loans for restructuring are typical. Ford did it when it was restructuring. Ford had the benefit of getting the loans before the credit crisis. No one would do that today, for Ford or Opel. Ford is doing better today because of those loans it took. Saying loans for restructuring is a stall tactic is incorrect. Restructuring is expensive and is required for long term survival and success (why do you think Magna wanted a large amount of loans as well).

  • avatar

    I hope they’re able to pull through, I’ve always like Opel. The new Ampera looks pretty sweet, much nicer curves than the Volt.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Ol Shel: Not picking on you, but your feet have rev matching too. It may not work too smoothly at first, but the more...
  • AK: Better question is how many engines do you want to pay for in that out of warranty GT350?
  • Ol Shel: Last chance to get a manual. Better buy up, folks. Next gen will be a hybrid with CVT, and then you get a...
  • tankinbeans: It’s available in the USA. I found the little screen showing when cylinders 1 and 4 were off. The...
  • tane94: Love love love that big brute in red! Glad to see some real color besides the white, grey, black schemes that...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber