Quote Of The Day: Chry The Beloved Automaker Edition


Chrysler may file a suit challenging the congressionally mandated dealer cull arbitration, reveals CEO Sergio Marchionne to Automotive News [sub].Why? Because it’s just not fair that dealers pressured congress to give them a fair shake. Wounded by the arbitrary backlash against his arbitrary cull, Marchionne threw his head back and cried unto the heavens:
Ask me what fairness is involved in all this. Why doesn’t anyone ask what’s fair to Chrysler?
Can’t Chrysler just catch a break? Besides the $14b in TARP money, the re-writing of bankruptcy law to secure it the best possible deal at the expense of “secured” lenders, the $1.5b rescue of its finance arm and unwarranted endorsements from government officials, Chrysler hasn’t received so much as a kind word from anyone. Worse still, Marchionne only got the whole re-financed, re-organized company for no money.
When Lord? When is it going to be Sergio’s time?

More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
Not feeling the love so much, Edward. Especially after seeing the smarmy photo attached to your comments. How about a column on the strip and flip by Daimler,(nobodies talking!) or the gutting by Cerberus. Most, if not all, of the TARP money will be repaid, with interest,(no mention here of the 25 Billion forgiven for AIG?). Chrysler was FORCED into bankruptcy by the feds, and its only hope of survival at all was the merger with Fiat.(Which is not a takeover, btw.) Chrysler's dealer body was bloated and underperforming, and needed pruning badly. IMO they should have scrapped most of them and started fresh. Nor was it culled by Marchionne. It's easy to be clever and witty at someone else's expense; why not give us some real news that you've researched and discovered by yourself? A little fairness and balance would help, too.
The feds refused to accept Chrysler's restructuring plan as presented, ergo, they were forced into insolvency. 35%, when achieved, is not a takeover. The UAW has 55% already, did they take it over? (Re-dealer culls), I may be wrong on this one but I believe those decisions were taken pre-Marchionne. He would not have had enough info to decide which dealers to drop at that point in time.
More Chrysler dealers should have been sacked,also here in Canada No dealers where closed to my knowledge, many of them should have been mainly because the way they treated Customers, much like most to the GM dealers who where sacked here !
I can just imagine a cruel laughter about the word Chrysler in between them both. Kind of like a hot potato... No one wants it.