By on January 21, 2010

We shall not be moved to pay €265m. Picture courtesy stern.de

Not surprisingly, the decision to close Antwerp is not sitting too well with Opel’s European Works Council. Their reply: Forget the wage concessions you wanted from us, and which are so critical for Opel’s survival.

Management at Opel wanted employees to contribute €265m annually to the cause. The unions were ready to deal, but wanted shares. Reilly reneged on the shares, which raised union hackles. Now, the offer is off the table. And with it, an essential piece of Opel’s future.

“Millions of Euros would have to be taken as loans in order to realize Nick Reilly’s intention to close Antwerp,” the works council said in a statement, quoted by Reuters. “These loans would have to be paid back by the employees of the remaining sites in Europe and would not be available for urgently needed product investments and market development.”

The unions are gearing up for a fight: Their statement called the decision to close Antwerp a “breach of contract.” GM had pledged to build the subcompact SUV in Antwerp after the Flemish did not get the job to build the current Astra.

Without union support for a restructuring plan, GM can forget any government loan guarantees. Come to think of it, very little in terms of government loan guarantees has been mentioned lately. Whenever the matter came up, the response was: “We need a viable plan.” An important part of that plan is now missing.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “Opel: Shots Fired...”


  • avatar
    WildBill

    Seems to me that in a global economy the Euro unions don’t get it either. Bertel, interesting saga this. I’m getting the feeling there is no good end to it for any of the parties involved.

  • avatar
    rnc

    They will get it before the end (they always do).  The reality is the US market is beginning to stabilize, GM went through BK, removed $70 billion in liabilities and as a parting gift were handed $40 billion in cash.  They can afford to play hardball with Opel and they can afford the $5 billion or so for restructuring, they would prefer not to pay for it themselves, but in the end, they will.

  • avatar
    OldandSlow

    These are folks who go to work everyday to plants that are a shell of their former selves. I’ll bet dollars to donuts that there is pretty of empty parking spaces in the employee lots. This should be a reminder that they work in a car market with too much overcapacity.

    2010 is not going to be banner sales year in Europe. Opel/Vauxhall won’t be profitable in a best case scenario during the coming year.

    I guess the unions are entitled to an series of industrial actions that will run the Opel/Vauxhall further into the ground.

    GM better incorporate their intellectual properties into a separate subsidiary, quick.

  • avatar
    OldandSlow

    Next year’s T-shirts may have to say “We were Opel” on the front.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • mcs: @Garak: It would also be good for search and rescue. In a search, with a gas model, the noise could drown out...
  • Garak: I could see quite a few places where you’d might want an electric model. Countries with expensive gas,...
  • DungBeetle62: Don’t know whose apple my Dad polished but in the early 80s after a parade of awful Cutlasses...
  • JD-Shifty: lowest gas prices were under Clinton. But that’s none of my business. We’ve seen wild price...
  • Buickman: anyone notice AutoNews has eliminated their comment section?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber