More Volume Or Head Upmarket? Hyundai Chooses Both.

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

When CEO Chung Mong-Koo told his employees to make Hyundai’s quality world class, their competitors all had a collective laugh. Well, we all know how that ended, so when Chung told his employee to increase sales, the competition should probably heed his words as a warning. The Korea Times reports that Chung Mong-Koo wants the Hyundai-Kia group to increase sales by 17% in 2010, from 4.63 million (2009) to 5.4 million. “Our teamwork helped turn a crisis into an opportunity when the global auto industry was at its darkest,” said Chung Mong-Koo. “Based on our achievements last year, let’s work together to make 2010 a year of writing a new history.” Analysts like Sohn Myung-woo of Woori Investment & Securities sees the goal as achievable, saying “Hyundai will continue its sales momentum in the U.S. and emerging markets such as China and India.” But besides expanding volume, Hyundai wants to use its momentum to continually improve its brand image in mature markets like the US. To that end, it’s paying more attention to how it markets its Genesis luxury semi-sub-brand.

USA Today reports that Dave Zuchowski, Hyundai’s U.S national sales chief, has sent a memo to Hyundai dealers across the United States stating that they need to do more in order to separate between regular Hyundai cars and the Genesis. And when they say “separate,” they mean “separate”: the ultimate goal is to create a “showroom within a showroom.” However, on Hyundai’s website, the Hyundais and Genesises (Geneses?) are side by side with each other. Hyundai are trying to avoid separate dealerships for the luxury brand, like Lexus, Acura and Infiniti did. While this “showroom within a showroom” technique will be cost efficient, it may not work in the long run. What partly helped Lexus, Acura and Infiniti get sales was the fact that they stayed separate from their mass volume marques (Toyota, Honda and Nissan, respectively), thus giving the impression that a new boy had come to the market. For better or worse, the “showroom within a showroom” idea will always keep the Genesis linked to Hyundai. Is the US market ready for a brand that spans from a $10k Accent to a $60k Equus, or will a velvet rope be enough to differentiate them? Only one way to find out.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 50 comments
  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Jan 05, 2010

    I have addressed stealing before. Hyundai steals. They stole the MKS grill for the new Equus. They stole the Mercedes design for the Genesis. Now you tell me...is this a stolen Mazda? Boys and girls, this is rediculous! http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/05/detroit-2010-hyundai-blue-will-phev-concept/

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Jan 05, 2010
    I’m still not drinkin’ the Korean Kool Aid yet. Whatever makes you feel good. I ended a 25-year love affair with Japanese cars to buy my first Hyundai, after poking in, around, and underneath it and finding it to be of superior construction to anything else. It had thicker materials, sturdier hardware, better-sealed undercarriage, and other signs of quality construction. It got strong reviews in every respectable publication, came with a superior warranty, and drove very nicely. Our Santa Fe is now in its third Canadian winter, and has pulled a camper all over North America without a whimper (or a single added drop of motor oil). The only mechanical problem so far has been a slightly noisy stabilizer link, which the dealer replaced in 20 minutes at no charge. If this is "Kool-Aid", go ahead and fill me up.
    • TonyJZX TonyJZX on Jan 05, 2010

      People still not 'buying' the Korean revolution will still be saying that when the Chinese get here... 5 yrs later and when GM/Chrysler are still sucking on the government teat.

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next