GM Offers Cash For Dealer Revamp… Eventually

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

You’d have to be a fairly trusting GM dealer to participate in what The General calls its Essential Brand Elements program. After all, it’s just the kind of dealership re-branding exercise that HUMMER dealers were forced into shortly before the brand was consigned to the ash heap of history. And once again, GM is asking dealers to create ideal showcases for its brands while keeping compensation for the renovations on a highly trust-dependent basis. GM wants brand-specific dealership rebrandings complete within three years, but will only pay for them over the next five to ten years reports Automotive News [sub]. And the payments won’t be fixed either, but will rather be tied to the dealer’s annual vehicle shipments using “a seasonally adjusted formula that takes into account the price of the vehicles sold.” According to Chevy’s Sales Manager Kurt McNeil, those payments could “conceivably” cover the recommended changes over the ten-year period. Are you feeling the trust yet?



The main aim of the Essential Brand Elements program is to fulfill GM’s long-cherished goal of kicking competitor brands out of its dealer network. According to AN [sub],

dealers will be asked to give competitive brands distinct space separate from GM brands by October. And GM will ask some dealers with a particularly high-selling GM brand to move that brand to its own building. If they comply, they’ll get the cash. If not, they won’t… [Cadillac sales manager Ed Peper] says Cadillac will have a long talk, at least, with any dealers who don’t remove competitors’ brands from their showrooms. GM hasn’t decided what to do about dealers who don’t comply.

The renovations themselves run from an estimated $200k-$300k for a Chevy dealership, to an estimated $400k-$600k for Cadillac shops, with Buick-GMC dealer costs still undetermined. They involve new elements designed by San Francisco architecture firm Gensler, including entries, greeting stations, floor tile and more. Participating dealers must also agree to use the brands’ new Web site looks, retrain their sales staffs, and hand over their sales and service customer lists to GM so it can “coordinate marketing mailings.”

Of course, the timing isn’t exactly perfect, as economic conditions are currently less than conducive to major investments in auto dealerships, particularly for GM dealerships. GM’s McNeil explains:

If [customers] have all these great experiences and interactions on the Internet, and then they walk into the dealership and it’s the same old experience — we need to connect those two… it’s really one of those situations where we’ve got to get started.

To which one dealer replies:

Everyone should have a nice facility, but goodness gracious, give us a chance to figure out what the market’s going to look like

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Brettc Brettc on Jan 05, 2010

    The two Chevy dealers closest to me have both upgraded their buildings in the last 2-3 years. They do look nicer from the outside. But I still won't set foot in them because I'll never buy a GM product. I'm sure there are many others with my point of view. It's just a waste of money for the dealers. They can even spend money on R&D and quality improvements and actually make dead reliable world class cars. But I still won't buy them when there are so many other world class manufacturers to choose from that didn't go to the bailout trough. Note to GM executives: You can polish a turd all you want, but in the end it's still a GM product.

  • Odomeater Odomeater on Jan 05, 2010

    BrettC- You are obviously not going to be swayed as you prefer to invest in foreign economies- and that is your perogative. It is the up in the air passer by that GM is targeting here.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next