Ford Posts $997 Million 3Q Profit

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Ford turned a profit in the second quarter of this year, thanks to a share offering and other debt-reduction actions which covered a $424M pre-tax operating loss. In the third quarter, however, Ford’s profit needs no such qualification. Pre-tax operating profits were $1.1B, including a $357M from North American operations. For the record, this marks the first Ford North America profit since Q1 2005. Perhaps more importantly, for an automaker that’s mortgaged up to (and including) its logo, Ford’s cash pile grew by $2.8B (on $1.3B positive cashflow), to $23.8B. On the strength of these surprisingly strong results, Ford has revised its 2010 guidance from being “break even or better” to “solidly profitable.” The future is looking far brighter for Ford than any of its cross-town rivals, but there are a few more considerations to keep in mind before we can pronounce Ford officially out of the woods. Even the Blue Oval is warning that its 2010 guidance will be revisited after full-year results are in.

Perhaps most importantly, 3Q profit from North American operations have to be seen in the context of Cash for Clunkers stimulus. Not only did volumes increase due to the $3B federal stimulus, but transaction prices were high as well. With the government offering up to $4,500 off of qualifying models, dealers were charging full price for much of the third quarter. Ford acknowledges [via the WSJ] that “lower material costs, job cuts and consumers buying more high-end models equipped with technology features,” contributed to its domestic profits. Whether Ford’s North American operations can turn a healthy profit without government stimulus remains to be seen.

In Europe, Ford’s sales have also been kept afloat on a wave of stimulus. Citing the end of clunker-stimulus in Germany, a slowdown in the UK and a savage downturn in the Russian market, Ford’s CFO notes:

Looking at 2010 there is a high likelihood of a substantial decrease in European industry volumes. This decrease could more than offset U.S. sales volumes which may improve somewhat from this past quarter’s results.

Though European pre-tax profits grew to $193M, revenue actually fell 21 percent to $7.6 billion. The falling revenue-increasing profit model was replicated in the Asia/Pacific region which posted $27M profits, despite revenue falling 11 percent to $1.5 billion. South American operations saw revenue fall 22 percent to $2.1 billion, although profits of $247M were down compared to last year on currency losses.

Ford’s overall revenue fell in the third quarter even when compared to 3Q 2008’s miserable performance. The major lesson from these third quarter results is that Ford is cutting its costs admirably to cope with reduced demand. The second major lesson: Ford needs to show it can keep revenue from falling further when post-clunker stimulus results come in in December. Meanwhile, a deeper downturn in European markets could spell real trouble in the short term, while modest gains in Asian growth markets point to longer-term challenges. By Detroit standards, however, these results are about as close to peachy as they’ve been in a long while. Just don’t tell the UAW . . . .

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Ohsnapback Ohsnapback on Nov 03, 2009

    It is going to be extremely interesting to see how Ford did during the non-CFC stimulative months, versus the CFC-laced ones. We'll know later today.

  • Orian Orian on Nov 03, 2009

    It's nice to see they are reporting a profit, but they aren't out of the woods yet - lets take a wait and see attitude towards this IMHO. I see a lot of improvement in their line up, but they still have the UAW parasite attempting to bleed them dry. Not to mention C4C - we'll know better by the end of the year...lets see how Q4 plays out for them.

  • TCowner Need to have 77-79 Lincoln Town Car sideways thermometer speedo!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
Next