Volvo-Geely Fallout: It's The Money, Stupid

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The deal to sell Volvo to Geely may be falling apart after 10 months of heavy petting. Everybody from Bloomberg to the DetN has lapped up the leak that it’s all about intellectual property that may be misappropriated in the Middle Kingdom. The true crime: A massive insult to the intelligence of the dear reader is being perpetrated. If there are concerns about stealing trade secrets, why did they come up now and not earlier, while Ford and Geely were progressing from first to second base in a cloud of steam? Did they fall asleep in the drive-in? Whatta we gonna tell your mama? Whatta we gonna tell your pa? “We say it’s about trade secrets.” “Great idea. Works all the time.”

The Financial Times found a more likely cause for the sudden interuptus:



Plain old money. According to the FT, “Ford has better reasons than real or imagined abuses for holding off on the sale of its one remaining international brand. The US car market may be in a wretched state, but Ford isn’t.”

According to the FT, Ford wants a better deal. Ford has gained market share in 11 of the past 12 months. Volvo’s September sales were even up 12 percent. FT’s intrepid reporters couldn’t help but note that when Ford put Volvo up for sale last December, the supposedly smart money thought Ford would die: Short-sellers held one in eight Ford shares. Now, the short interest is only one in 33 shares. Ford is way out of the desperate firesale phase.

Ford’s latest quarterly filing shows a carrying value for Volvo of about $2.4b. Geely offers $2b, resulting in a book loss of $400m. Even the FT recommends that Mulally “shouldn’t settle for less” than the book value.

As opined by yours truly, foreign car companies have shared intellectual property with Chinese for more than 20 years. In joint venture companies. Ford happily shares Volvo IP with its Chinese joint venture partner Dongfeng.

IP is a handy excuse when a deal goes sour, or when the price should go up. When GM didn’t like the Magna deal, they cried about IP going to Russia. Now, no more IP problems, the problem is Brussels.

If IP is indeed what’s holding up the Volvo sale, then IP is an acronym for Increased Price.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Geotpf Geotpf on Oct 22, 2009

    Volvo is in much better shape than Jaguar/Land Rover. Dumping those on Tata looks positively brillant at this point.

  • Guyincognito Guyincognito on Oct 22, 2009

    Ford is right to ask for more money for Volvo. Its not that I think Volvo is going to earn a profit any time soon, but their rep for safety would be a boon for any Chinese manufacturer. In fact, of all the automakers out there, I think Volvo would be the biggest prize for the Chinese.

  • SCE to AUX Range only matters if you need more of it - just like towing capacity in trucks.I have a short-range EV and still manage to put 1000 miles/month on it, because the car is perfectly suited to my use case.There is no such thing as one-size-fits all with vehicles.
  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek&nbsp;recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue.&nbsp;"Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
Next