Pick Your Scion Lineup

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

As the latest sales show (and have been showing for some time now) Scion is one hot mess. And though the best advice we can give is for Toyota to start selling its JDM confections as Toyotas, somehow we don’t think the big T wants to hear it. Instead, why not pick a new lineup from the latest batch of Daihatsu concepts shown at the Tokyo show [courtesy: AutoBild]? Or better yet, post a link to other Toyota/Daihatsu products that could pep up the least youthful “youth brand’s” sales. After all, anything would be better than leaving Scion as-is.



Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • JuniorMint JuniorMint on Oct 10, 2009

    HAHA OHHH MAN YOU GUYS WITH YOUR MOVING BOX AND BREAD TRUCK AND FRIDGE COMMENTS ARE SOOOO FUNNY, or would be if those jokes hadn't been making the rounds since 2004. Got any zingers about chickens crossing roads? Any of the four of them would be better than the current crop. And I say that as an example of the original formula working: I was 23 when I bought my xB (waited 6 weeks for it) and I had only bought GM trucks until then. I wanted something that I could afford, that wouldn't break after 36 months, and that would alienate Baby Boomers. Enter the Gen 1 xB - check, check and check! As previously indicated, average buying age for Scion was 36. And that's not even taking into account the slew of 80-year-olds I see in first-gen boxes...so somewhere there must be an entire state of 20-somethings with Scions. I suspect California. The original formula was geared toward young people but also appealed to thrifty and old people. The new formula is geared apparently at bitter focus-group participants (who all probably have Camries at home), and appeals to nobody. FIX PLZ. What about the Gen 2 bB? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_bB That's baffling, ugly, small and economical...should be a hit!

  • FreedMike FreedMike on Oct 12, 2009

    I think these cars were designed by R2-D2 during a bad acid trip.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next