EV Success: It's The Price Point, Stupid

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
ev success it s the price point stupid

Actually, that’s not the equivocal message we might have expected from a University of Michigan study on electric vehicle (EV) viability [via Green Car Congress]. Instead, the money quote reads:

The data provide strong evidence that a combination of economic and social incentives may be most effective in successfully introducing these vehicles.

The study’s baseline shows that, given no increase in fuel costs, 42 percent of those surveyed would consider buying an EV. But with every doubling of a hypothetical price premium, the probability of purchase fell by about 16 percent. At a $10k premium, only 14 percent said they would consider purchasing an EV. Which is enough to conclude that the “social incentives” of EV ownership are enough to create a certain level of demand for even uncompetitively-priced vehicles. And that seems to indicate that breathless green marketing is here to stay. In fact, if the image after the jump is anything to go on, this eco-toehold in the minds of some consumers will likely be exploited with ever-more breathtaking shamelessness.

Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Fincar1 Fincar1 on Oct 21, 2009

    I am getting tired about reading all this stuff about how electric cars will be comparable to petrol-powered ones just as soon as the battery technology is worked out and the economies of scale kick in. It is my honest opinion that in the mid-teens (around 1915 for the kids) when the occasional Detroit Electric could be seen silently conveying some dowager on her shopping errand, exactly the same kind of hype was being shoveled out by the electric car partisans. There is nothing new under the sun, and internal combustion engines have not reached the limit of their development.

  • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Oct 22, 2009

    Okay but why not have a mix of propulsion systems on the streets today? I don't EVER expect a battery car to be a cross country touring car using a battery unless we move on to some super capacitor idea. 300 miles and a fast recharge. Or some 200 mile car with a 5 min battery swap machine at former gas stations. I also don't EVER expect an internal combustion engine to get double the efficiency it does today. 75 years ago the family sedan got about 15 mpg. Today the family SUV still only gets about 15 mpg. Yes the modern SUV is heavier and has more driveline drag. Yes it is cleaner at least. Still each time we get more efficient people soak up that efficiency with more weight and options like 4WD. It seems there are the naysayers who won't believe anybody would be happy driving an EV and the folks with a copy of "Who Killed the Electric Car" on their movie shelf. We shouldn't pursue a single solution to getting around. All that does is make a single group of people rich. Let's drive a mix of electric and gasoline and even hydrogen power. Same thing happens with electricity generation. People arguing that solar or wind isn't relevant because they can't replace coal or nukes. Put solar and wind everywhere we can. The coal and nuke plants can then throttle back a little and make less pollution and consume fewer resources. We need a little of this and a little of that folks!

  • Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
  • Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
  • ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
  • ToolGuy Last picture: Labeling the accelerator as "play" and the brake pedal as "pause" might be cute, but it feels wrong. It feels wrong because it is wrong, and it is wrong because Calculus.Sidebar: I have some in-laws who engage the accelerator and brake on a binary on/off all-in basis. So annoying as a passenger.Drive smoothly out there. 🙂
  • Johnny ringo It's an interesting vehicle, I'd like to see VW offer the two row Buzz in the states also.