Brussels Impales Opel With Giant Fork. Turkey In Serious Condition

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt
A certain website that concerns itself with facts about automobiles, had opined more than a month ago: “Once matters move to Brussels, they come to a crawl. Whoever wins the German elections has all the time they want to dispose of Opel. If it goes kaput, they can blame the Americans and Brussels.”The Opel matter finally moved to Brussels. EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes said, she could set aside her considerable qualms about the GM-Opel-Magna-Sperbank deal, if only all parties involved would send her a simple letter that certifies that the deal had not been reached under political pressure. All parties involved, meaning GM, the Opel Trust that officially owns Opel, and the German government. Scout’s honor. Cross your heart, and swear to … exactly.Ms. Kroes stuck a monstrous Morton’s fork into the deal: If the letters are sent, and if an EU probe finds that there was pressure, then the authors can be subject to painfully substantial fines, the €1.5b bridge loan may have to be refunded, Opel is dead, all parties involved will be in a world of hurt.If the letters are not sent, then the deal is dead because the EU will sprout a Brussels-sized inquisition, they will not approve the deal because the parties concerned will have already admitted that there was pressure, the bridge loan may have to be refunded, all parties involved will be in a world of hurt.Was there pressure? Do ursines defecate in the forest? From Berlin on down through the states to the unions, one thing was made clear: No Magna, no money. There was so much pressure that meetings were only survivable wearing a diving helmet. There was so much pressure that Berlin’s own boys in the Opel Trust complained about telephone terror by politicians. In the end, Manfred Wennemer as representative of the Berlin government voted against, and Dirk Pfeil as representative of the states abstained when the Opel Trust had to decide on accepting the deal. The deal was approved with the votes of the GM representatives, who hated it, but had a German gun to their heads. There was so much pressure that Wennemer was lambasted in Berlin after the vote.GM had been under so much pressure that their lawyers undoubtedly said such a letter would amount to a suicide note. There is no letter from GM. Instead, it was leaked all over the German press that GM has serious legal issues with such a note. “We were given no other alternative than Magna,” an unnamed GM source is quoted in Financial Times. Translation: “Hell yes, we’ll readily admit there was pressure!”The Opel Trust is likewise hesitant when it comes to penning a letter to Nellie. “We haven’t sent a letter to Brussels,” Opel Trust member Dirk Pfeil said to the Frankfurter Allgemeine. Pfeil had never liked the Opel deal.The only party to send a letter to Brussels was the German government. Economy Minister von und zu Guttenberg assured Kroes that the €4.5b would be open to any Opel buyer on a strictly non-discriminatory basis. Easy for him to say. He also was against the Magna deal, approved it only for reasons of political expedience. Now that the elections are over, and his boys have won, von Guttenberg would like nothing more than pressure from Brussels. He could blame it on Brussels, could say “we tried our best,” and could renegotiate the whole deal until Opel dies.Opel would not survive the operation. Opel is running out of time and out of money. According to the Financial Times, Berlin’s €1.5b bridge loan will be burned by the end of the year, in light of a current cash conflagration to the tune of €300m a month.And who puts a happy face on the whole ordeal? Fritz “the Cat” Henderson. He expects the Opel deal to close this week, says Reuters. Is there a doctor in the house?
Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Corky Boyd Corky Boyd on Oct 24, 2009

    Ms Kroes is French. The French government owns a healthy chunk of Renault. The French government would be happier with one less manufacturer vying aganst Renault. It is within Ms Kroes' power to make that happen. Bye bye Opel. Also, has anyone tallied up how much government subsidy goes into Renault's F1 program? I guess that doesn't count.

  • Iamwho2k Iamwho2k on Oct 24, 2009
    You don’t think Boeing get any US Government money? Sure, Boeing gets money --for delivering products and services. As the WTO just reported, what Airbus gets is illegal subsidies. Boeing just reported big losses stemming from its inability to develop the 787 and 747-8 properly, but they can't run to the US gov't for help like Airbus can to its sugar daddies.
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next