3 Reasons Why A Ferrari Will Not Get You Laid

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

If cocaine is God’s way of saying you have too much money, a Ferrari is God’s way of saying you have too much money and too clean a driving license. Of course, there are plenty of good reasons to buy a bit of Maranello magic. The average Fezza makes Marissa Miller look like Hagrid. While a Ferrari will kill you dead with snap oversteer, right up to that point, they handle like a Camillus Sizzle Folding Lockback. The cars smell like sex and sound like . . . sex. Well, someone having sex. Someone LOUD, experiencing a great deal of echt pleasure. Of course, there are plenty of reasons NOT to buy a Ferrari. Chief amongst them: attempting to light a box of wet cigars with hundred dollar bills is a more financially rewarding pursuit. But if you should be considering the possibility of owning a Ferrari, even from afar, here’s something to keep in mind: it will not get you laid. In fact, there was only one time I ever saw a woman put out for a Ferrari owner. It was a key scene in Peter North’s short-lived Maximum Thrust series. And I got the distinct impression that the woman in question (and the man in the woman in question) would have done the wild thing if they’d used a 1967 Camaro as the bait car. Keeping in mind the whole scene was fictional. Well, in terms of motivation. Anyway . . .

Perhaps now would be a good time to point out that I’m speaking here about heterosexual relations. Although I appreciate a taut six-pack as much as the next beer drinker (one wonders who instructed the beverage and what it learned), I am only fully qualified to talk about the male – female – Ferrari menage a trois. So . . .

1. Ferrari mechanics don’t put out – Let’s face it: Ferraris break. Ferrari has. The head of their NA ops told me straight out: “Ferrari owners understand that they’re subsidizing real world testing of new technologies.” And they have the Mercedes to prove it. Ask Walter: your Ferrari mechanic will spend more time with your car than you will. In fact, he’ll be amongst the select group of people who knows that you own a Ferrari. ‘Cause you won’t want to drive it in bad weather. Or put miles on it during the week. And when you do drive it, you’ll want to drive it; not try and get laid.

2. Woman worth sleeping with don’t sleep with men based on their cars – Technically, this isn’t a reason why your Ferrari won’t get you laid. But given the genetic stakes involved with the whole fluid-swapping deal, it’s not an invidious distinction. If you’re rich enough to afford a Ferrari, you do not want to sleep with the kind of woman who sleeps with you based on your car (remember: this is after high school, when most boys want to sleep with any woman who wants to sleep with them for any reason). And if you do, you’re smart enough to know that it’s a lot easier to simply pay cash for the privilege [insert air quotes here] and be done with it.

By the same token, the kind of women who would sleep with a man because he has a Ferrari—and is enough of a babe to make a straight cash transaction seem unseemly—would be smart enough to estimate the owner’s total net worth based on more than his four-wheeled Italian toy (which she’ll know may represent the mother of all car payments). And she’d be smart enough to not let him know that she knew it. So while she might be sleeping with you because of your Ferrari, the mansion would have been enough anyway. Another technical argument, but I didn’t write the headline. Or, more precisely, I didn’t think about it enough when I did. Hey, I was distracted.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Sinistermisterman Sinistermisterman on Oct 15, 2009

    "Or, maybe a 1986 Pontiac Trans Am" OMG that advert rocks. You can just imagine the complaints an advert like that would get today. BTW, I get some and I currently driving a 1986 Dodge Aries... Not out of choice I might add.

  • Rufusprime99 Rufusprime99 on Jan 30, 2013

    Oh come on. We all see what is going on here. You are just trying to comfort all those guys that DON'T have a Ferrari. The man who has a Ferrari is a man who appreciates beauty and magic. The woman who will put out for a man like this will be bold, tan, tall, have great hips, a flat stomach, generous breasts, a wry smile and a twinkle in her eye. This won't be some cheap, lurid encounter, comparable to something one would pay for. While it will likely be a one time thing, it will be a joyful, playful and memorable event. Mischievous, fun, MAGIC. Kind of like driving a Ferrari. ;) And don't think the fun is just for the guy. The story the woman will tell is: "I went for a drive in this guys' Ferrari. And, it was just so......Red, the engine so..... masculine, and well we..... well, you know. It was amazing." So ladies, when your Ferrari guy rolls up, don't miss your chance.

  • Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
  • Dwford The real crime is not bringing this EV to the US (along with the Jeep Avenger EV)
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis? 🙈
  • SCE to AUX "Hyundai told us that perhaps he or she is a performance enthusiast who is EV hesitant."I'm not so sure. If you're 'EV hesitant', you're not going to jump into a $66k performance car for your first EV experience, especially with its compromised range. Unless this car is purchased as a weekend toy, which perhaps Hyundai is describing.Quite the opposite, I think this car is for a 2nd-time EV buyer (like me*) who understands what they're getting into. Even the Model 3 Performance is a less overt track star.*But since I have no interest in owning a performance car, this one wouldn't be for me. A heavily-discounted standard Ioniq 5 (or 6) would be fine.Tim - When you say the car is longer and wider, is that achieved with cladding changes, or metal (like the Raptor)?
  • JMII I doubt Hyundai would spend the development costs without having some idea of a target buyer.As an occasional track rat myself I can't imagine such a buyer exists. Nearly $70k nets you a really good track toy especially on the used market. This seems like a bunch of gimmicks applied to a decent hot hatch EV that isn't going to impression anyone given its badge. Normally I'd cheer such a thing but it seems silly. Its almost like they made this just for fun. That is awesome and I appreciate it but given the small niche I gotta think the development time, money and effort should have been focused elsewhere. Something more mainstream? Or is this Hyundai's attempt at some kind of halo sports car?Also seems Hyundai never reviles sales targets so its hard to judge successful products in their line up. I wonder how brutal depreciation will be on these things. In two years at $40k this would a total hoot.So no active dampers on this model?
Next