Opel Watch: GM, Germany and the Gordian Knot

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM is stepping up efforts to retain some control over Opel this week, as political pressure builds to find a solution before German elections on September 27. GM sources told the Wall Street Journal that Spain, Britain and Poland would jointly contribute “about €1B” towards repaying a German government bridge loan. Should the nationalized American automaker pay off the note, they could then sell Opel to their “preferred” third party buyer option, RHJ. The private equity fund dug around in the couch and came up with another €25M, raising its offer to buy Opel from GM to €300M. Coincidence?

RHJ backers may have been “inspired” by GM’s desperation to sweeten the pot, but it isn’t likely to make much of a difference. Magna’s bid is worth €500M (€350M in upfront equity). Job cut estimates—an important element for Germany’s strong labor unions—are about the same for both bids. Add the German government’s repeatedly-stated preference for Opel, and it’s obvious that RHJ’s extra ante is too little too late.

GM’s fund raising efforts with European governments who just happen to host Opel plants is of considerably greater consequence. German government sources tell Dow Jones that they consider GM’s extort—uh, negotiations—“legitimate.”

In fact, DJ reckons GM could end up with a majority stake in Opel. GM sources tell the Wall Street Journal that GM could put as much as $1B of “its own money” down to keep Opel all in the family. Just to clarify, that would be American tax dollars going to save Opel.

But not if Klaus Franz has anything to say about it.

“It’s not enough with just 1.5 billion or 2 billion euros,” Opel’s union boss tells Automotive News [sub]. “In order to pay back the bridge loan, GM needs to come up with $2 billion, and then there would not be a single cent left to invest in new products or restructuring the 25 to 30 percent of over capacity.” And one more thing. “The employees want to make sustainable contributions but not if we should return to 100 percent control under GM.”

But German Chancellor Angela Merkel has more than just feisty unionists to worry about. She’s also under fire from her own center-right party. “Should GM not want to sell Opel, then we will demand back our bridge financing of 1.5 billion euros,” CDU Parliamentary leader Volker Kauder said. “We can only remind GM’s leadership once again that they should stick to the agreement reached a few months ago and negotiate a contract with Magna.”

Meanwhile, even the EU is giving GM’s divide-and-conquer strategy a thumbs down. “We still have to see the details, but you cannot make state-aid conditional on localizing an investment in a particular country,” explain the European Commission’s competition arm via spokesman.

“The employees want to make sustainable contributions but not if we should return to 100 percent control under GM,” says Klaus Franz, head of Opel’s union.

Of course, Carl-Peter Forster, General Motors Europe president, is hedging his/your bets. Automotive News [sub] reports that Forster . . .

believes Magna International Inc. is most likely to win a bidding battle for Opel, but he says that the carmaker could also thrive under the ownership of its US parent.

“Magna is the most likely for me because all conditions have been met, the contracts have been negotiated and the financing is in place,” Forster told the Die Welt newspaper.

Expediency über alles, ja?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Srynerson Srynerson on Sep 04, 2009
    Where did GM find 1 billion euros? Every time there's a recall, they check under the seats for dropped change and put it in a jar....
  • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Sep 07, 2009

    Delay tactics. I wonder if GM is delaying so they hope enough time passes that either they will have enough of their own money (tax money) to keep Opel or enough time will pass that they can ask the US gov't for another handout. I agree GM should have been split up to become competing companies. Pontiac vs Caddy vs GMC vs Chevy vs Saab vs Saturn. It might be a good solution for a possible cultural problem than a question of enough real expertise at GM. Too many folks keeping their jobs or getting promoted based on their ability to negotiate corporate BS (i.e. kiss up to the right people) than advancing based on real merit. In other words perhaps the good people aren't getting recognized and thus alot of good ideas get passed over. Breaking up GM would put the fear of some deity above into them and get them busy. No more of this product hierachy BS and more of building the best vehicles they can. Maybe they would shed some of the expensive managment and get back to being a car company building interesting cars that don't need HYPE and GREENWASH to sell them and more like Honda products that just have a good rep. I hope if Opel gets sold that they can just bring their products here without going through the GM blender first. I'd like to see more Astra like products that get promoted and have enough future that I'd feel good about owning an Astra for a decade knowing I can get parts for it when I need them. Saw only my SECOND Astra over the weekend and only the first in this town. Was a low spec four door. The first Astra I saw was at Christmas in Chattanooga. It was a high spec two-door. No local promotion and not enough of them on the road to be self-promoting.

  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
Next