Lobbyists Battle for Handouts in Federal Transportation Bill

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

As Congress works on extending the authorization for transportation programs in the current session, thousands of lobbyists are investing millions in political donations and billable hours in the hopes of receiving a big payout in public dollars. The Center for Public Integrity, a left-wing watchdog group, last week released the results of an exhaustive examination of the financial ties between transportation lobbyists and lawmakers. In the first half of this year alone, 2100 lobbyists spent $45 million on influencing lawmakers who are busy dividing up an estimated $500 billion in funding ( view lobbying map). “Over the past two decades, this is the way federal transportation policy has largely been made in America — by a quasi-private club of interest groups and local governments carving out something for everyone, creating a nationwide patchwork of funded bypasses, interchanges, bridges, and rail lines with no overarching philosophy behind it,” Center staff writer Matthew Lewis explained.

Among the government entities involved, the Center found 475 cities, 160 counties and 12 states have sent lobbyists to Capitol Hill using public funds. Another 55 local development authorities, 95 transit agencies, 25 metro and regional planning organizations invested heavily in lobbying.

From the private sector, a total of 130 real estate, construction and engineering groups sent representatives to Washington, DC. Another group of 75 highway builders, trucking groups and automobile manufacturers sought business opportunities in the corridors of the US Capitol. A total of 140 universities, 45 rail organizations and 45 bicycle coalitions and research groups also sought handouts.

A revolving door between those who seek funds and those who hand out taxpayer money helps to ensure the lobbying process proceeds smoothly. For example, Sante Esposito spent eleven years as the chief Democratic counsel on the House Transportation Committee. Now as a lobbyist for the firm Federal Advocates she boasts of having secured $850 million in public funding for paying clients, which include five California cities, an engineering firm and the Association of Railroads.

In total, three dozen current lobbyists once served as House or Senate Transportation Committee staffers. Another three dozen worked with the appropriations committees. Twenty former members of Congress are now high-paid transportation lobbyists.

The Center disclosed that the Rockefeller Foundation provided funding for the project. This foundation also donates money to one of the largest special interest transportation coalitions, Transportation for America, whose goal is to take gas tax money away from projects that improve roads and instead push federal officials to pour the funds into rail projects.

[courtesy thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Powerpeecee Powerpeecee on Sep 23, 2009

    Entirely too much color saturation in the photo.

  • Stuki Stuki on Sep 24, 2009

    As long as a small group of sleazebags (aka members of Congress) have $500 billion to throw around, of course people are going to try to steer some of the loot their way. Why wouldn't they? As long as influence is bought for cash, it is at least allocated according to a relatively open process that anyone can take part in. It would be much less equitable if influencing the Congress Critters instead required coming at them the back way, via putting your kids in their kids' schools, promising them airtime in national media etc. Best of all would of course be if they simply had no $500 billion loot to hand out in the first place, but given our current sorry predicament, the more open and obvious the corruption is, the better.

  • Tassos Ford models are like dumb Hollywood movies. The original is far better than their god damned sequels. This was true of the Mustang vs the II, AND the Capri vs its second gen, and their BEV PORKER atrocities many decades later
  • Jeff I would not buy a Chinese car with the current global situation with Taiwan and Ukraine but I believe eventually China will become the number 1 producer of vehicles globally. Lou brought up a valid point that much of the content of new vehicles has components made in China. Even many of the tires that are sold are made in China. Try buying a small appliance or electronics that are not made in China. Many of the electric motors that go in power reclining furniture are made in China. Many auto parts especially replacement parts are made in China.
  • 2ACL Not as bad as some have quipped, but half the appeal of a sport compact is the car on which it's based. The Ion was one of the worst in segment, blunting the outreach of GMPD's work. More marginalization hit in the form of competitors evolving into some of their most compelling interations. $8.5k? KBB tells Joe Average to aim for half that. Within the context of those specifically interested in this model, the magic words for asking more than market seem to be 'Competition Package.' If the best the seller can do in a short ad is vaguely reference aftermarket audio, they don't deserve a premium.
  • The Oracle I can’t wait to see the UAW attempt to organize the Chinese plants when they come.
  • Redapple2 They strove to excel and improve in this era ( on the cheap? ). They gave us Saturnasty and Northstarubish and the F150 grew in dependability and features over the Silveradoffal. -gm- a legacy of utter garbage.