DC: Camera Ticket Overturned Over Accuracy Doubts

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Doubts over the accuracy of the speed camera equipment led to the dismissal of a Washington, DC photo radar ticket last month. On May 7, a 34-year-old engineer from Alexandria, Virginia had been driving on Interstate 295/395 near 9th Street on a sunny morning when a mobile speed camera operated by American Traffic Solutions snapped a photo of the engineer’s car. The camera claimed that the Audi was traveling at 51 MPH, 11 MPH over the District’s 40 MPH interstate speed limit.


The motorist, who requested anonymity, decided to fight the citation out of “spite.” He arrived at the District’s Department of Motor Vehicles on August 17 unprepared with an argument that would beat the ticket. He fully expected to lose, but thought it was right to “cost the city more money” because he saw the photo radar program as little more than an illegitimate money grab. The motorist was surprised, however, when Adjudicator Stephen Reichert took one look at the ticket photo and noted that a second vehicle had been within the radar’s field of view. Radar guidelines suggest this situation could cause a spurious radar reading, especially since the District’s contractor provided no video or other secondary verification of speed. View full-size photo.

“Inasmuch as the government-submitted photograph shows multiple vehicles traveling through the radar zone in a receding direction, the government has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that respondent’s vehicle was identified as the vehicle speeding,” Reichert wrote. “Thus the ticket is dismissed.”

The motorist was glad he did not need to give the speech against the system that he had planned to give.

“I said ‘no’ when asked if I had anything else to add, and out I went with my cash remaining in my pocket,” the motorist told TheNewspaper. “Cost to me: $3.30 in Metro fares. Win.”

As of last month, the District’s private photo enforcement contractors had mailed a total of 4,019,023 tickets worth a total of $305 million. That is equivalent to one ticket not just for every resident of Washington, DC, but for every single resident of the District plus surrounding Virginia and Maryland suburbs.

A copy of the adjudicator’s decision is available in a 250k PDF file at the source link below.

Department of Motor Vehicles Hearing Record (Government of the District of Columbia, 8/17/2009)

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • Dave_from_VA Dave_from_VA on Jul 05, 2010

    June 2010 Received a dismissal letter :)

    • See 1 previous
    • Juliev Juliev on Jan 10, 2012

      @hinokaoi My daughter just got the same ticket, it also has another car in the picture, even though on the back it it says the camera wouldn't take a picture with another car. Did you get your ticket dismissed? thank you, julie

  • Cackalacka Cackalacka on Oct 13, 2010

    Nice, well done, Dave. After 20 years of speeding ticket-less driving, DC has sent me an 11 over in a 40. Photo is eerily similar to yours. In the spirit of the 6th amendment, I am going to attempt adjudication, as well.

    • Cackalacka Cackalacka on Jun 28, 2011

      Update: Got a response back from the adjudicator. Beat it. Strange how nearly identical my photo ticket was to the original. Change the day to night and make the car on the left an SUV, otherwise, the same. May even be the same road, for that matter...

  • Analoggrotto Tell us you're vying for more Hyundai corporate favoritism without telling us. That Ioniq N test drive must have really gotten your hearts.
  • Master Baiter EV mandates running into the realities of charging infrastructure, limited range, cost and consumer preferences. Who could possibly have predicted that?
  • Jkross22 Our experience is that the idea of leasing/owning an EV is better than the experience of getting a closer look at them and coming away underwhelmed.
  • Ajla I never thought I'd advocate for an alphanumeric but "Junior" is a terrible name.
  • Arthur Dailey So pay moving costs, pay penalties or continue to pay for space in the RenCen, and purchase all new furniture and equipment. Rather than just consolidating in place and subleasing. Another brilliant business decision.
Next