UK Hands Taxpayer Money to Anti-Motorist Groups

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Special interest groups devoted to undermining the rights of motorists have received millions in grants from the UK government. These organizations promote raising taxes on drivers, increasing the number of speed cameras and boosting subsidies for inefficient modes of transportation. A report issued earlier this month by The Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA) used freedom of information requests and government reports to calculate the amount of public money that lobbying groups receive.


“The TPA report goes a long way towards explaining why the debates on the issues of road transport and climate policy are so one-sided,” said Paul Biggs, spokesman for the Association of British Drivers (ABD). “Democracy is being bypassed in order to further agendas that wouldn’t survive objective scrutiny or a proper democratic process. The use of taxpayers’ money to fund political viewpoints that they may seriously not agree with is a national scandal that needs to be urgently addressed.”

The Campaign for Better Transport, also known as Transport 2000, strongly advocates the use of speed bumps, the lowering of speed limits to 20 MPH, narrowing of roads, speed cameras, permanent road closures and many other policies designed to make driving less attractive. The group was recently quoted in the Daily Mail newspaper supporting a government proposal to impose a £350 (US $580) annual tax on drivers who park at work.

For its work supporting government proposals, the group received £417,210 (US $691,405) in public funds in 2007. In addition to the public money, another twenty percent of the group’s funds come from bus and train companies, according to a 2006 Daily Telegraph article.

Environmental groups like Living Streets, Friends of the Earth and The Green Alliance took £440,000 (US $727,000) in public funds. Brake is the most prominent of professional speed camera advocacy groups in the UK. The organization received £70,991 (US $117,373) in government grants and £285,718 (US $472,495) from corporate donors. Brake refuses to identify these donors.

The Taxpayers’ Alliance believes using public money to support such groups has a chilling effect on free speech.

“This kind of spending massively distorts the British political debate,” the TPA report stated. “When public policy and debate is driven by campaigns that represent the priorities of politicians and bureaucrats instead of the public, the views of ordinary people are increasingly pushed to the sidelines. Taxpayer funded lobbying and campaigning needs to end.”

A copy of the TPA report is available in a 750k PDF file at the source link below.

Taxpayer Funded Lobbying and Political Campaigning (The Taxpayers Alliance, 8/1/2009)

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Ruckover Ruckover on Aug 14, 2009

    jkross22 : “People that want to keep the government out of Medicare are idiots, nobody should refrain from calling them that.” Great example of how character assassination poisons debating issues. jkross, I think the comment was pointing out that Medicare is a governmental program, so it would be impossible to keep the government out of it. It was not a comment about the efficiencies of the program.

  • Durishin Durishin on Aug 15, 2009

    Can't wait for Jezza to get a hold of this one! http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/jeremy_clarkson/

  • Lorenzo Are they calling it a K4? That's a mountain in the Himalayas! Stick with names!
  • MaintenanceCosts It's going to have to go downmarket a bit not to step on the Land Cruiser's toes.
  • Lorenzo Since EVs don't come in for oil changes, their owners don't have their tires rotated regularly, something the dealers would have done. That's the biggest reason they need to buy a new set of tires sooner, not that EVs wear out tires appreciably faster.
  • THX1136 Always liked the Mustang though I've never owned one. I remember my 13 yo self grabbing some Ford literature that Oct which included the brochure for the Mustang. Using my youthful imagination I traced the 'centerfold' photo of the car AND extending the roof line back to turn it into a small wagon version. At the time I thought it would be a cool variant to offer. What was I thinking?!
  • GregLocock That's a bodge, not a solution. Your diff now has bits of broken off metal floating around in it.
Next