GM Mortgaging China to Save Opel?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

There’s some surprising news in Automotive News [sub] today in GM’s ongoing attempt to save Opel (and, more importantly, its intellectual property). Since the German Government shot down the only proposal that would keep Opel IP with GM, the General is scrambling to prevent its erstwhile German arm from falling to Magna and GAZ/Sberbank. But who on earth would give GM the $4 billion it needs (now) to keep Opel on board the mothership (for the moment)? Surely only the American taxpayers are that gullible! Unfortunately for GM, there’s a catch. Automotive News explains:

Because GM is barred from using funding from the U.S. government from its reorganization in bankruptcy to support its international operations, one of the options could include raising money by selling or mortgaging the automaker’s assets in China, one of the sources said.

Ruh-roh! China is widely acknowledged to be GM’s saving grace. The General enjoys a long-term presence and favorable brand image in the world’s largest and strongest market for cars, and it could be argued that Chinese profits kept GM from gong bankrupt years ago. On the other hand, Opel’s sales fell more than ten percent in 2008, part of a sales erosion that dates back years. The problem? GM’s recent $9 billion investment in Opel (current status unclear), $6.5 billion of which was planned for new product development. Much of that money presumably generated products and platforms that GM is counting on to fill out its global portfolios. If all that IP goes away though (and again, that “if” is based on how much of that investment was made before GM’s bankruptcy), GM could be forced into greater dependence on its less-lauded Daewoo division to develop global products.

What’s a multinational to do? GM could probably find plenty of offers for loans backed by GM China assets, but only because the assets are valuable and the risk of GM eventually defaulting are high. Losing China to save Opel would be GM’s final epic blunder, but losing a major source of future product development and IP won’t be good either. GM is so not out of the woods, it isn’t even funny.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Wsn Wsn on Aug 26, 2009

    A more realistic way for GM, is to find a rich Chinese partner and buy Opel. That way GM still has 50% and the Chinese partner will need GM's expertise in running the company. Just like GM-SAIC.

  • Christy Garwood Christy Garwood on Aug 26, 2009

    FYI jerry weber from GM employee communications sheets: 2010 La Crosse EPA/Powertrain: 3.0 & 3.6 Engine dual overhead cam, direct-inject 6 cylinder engines fuel-conserving six-speed automatic transmission: 27 hwy/18 city MPG Available Late 2009 - Ecotec 2.4L Four-cylinder engine - 30hwy/20 city MPG

  • TCowner We've had a 64.5 Mustang in the family for the past 40 years. It is all original, Rangoon Red coupe with 289 (one of the first instead of the 260), Rally Pac, 4-speed, factory air, every option. Always gets smiles and thumbs ups.
  • ToolGuy This might be a good option for my spouse when it becomes available -- thought about reserving one but the $500 deposit is a little too serious. Oh sorry, that was the Volvo EX30, not the Mustang. Is Volvo part of Ford? Is the Mustang an EV? I'm so confused.
  • Mikey My late wife loved Mustangs ..We alway rented one while travelling . GM blood vetoed me purchasing one . 3 years after retirement bought an 08 rag top, followed by a 15 EB Hard top, In 18 i bought a low low mileage 05 GT rag with a stick.. The car had not been properly stored. That led to rodent issues !! Electrical nightmare. Lots of bucks !! The stick wasn't kind to my aging knees.. The 05 went to a long term dedicated Mustang guy. He loves it .. Today my garage tenant is a sweet 19 Camaro RS rag 6yl Auto. I just might take it out of hibernation this weekend. The Mustang will always hold a place in my heart.. Kudos to Ford for keeping it alive . I refuse to refer to the fake one by that storied name .
  • Ajla On the Mach-E, I still don't like it but my understanding is that it helps allow Ford to continue offering a V8 in the Mustang and F-150. Considering Dodge and Ram jumped off a cliff into 6-cylinder land there's probably some credibility to that story.
  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
Next