Will Ford Need Another Debt-For-Equity Swap?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Ford has been benefiting heavily from “good kid syndrome” lately. You know how it goes, as long as your behavior is marginally better than your sibling’s, you’re the good kid. Just ask the self-styled Autoextremist.

I believe that Ford will emerge as the largest and most profitable U.S. automaker and stay that way for the foreseeable future. They have the strongest management team (led by ex-Boeing executive Alan Mulally who is simply one of the best who has ever worked in this business), they have sensational products here and on the way (their new product cadence is extremely impressive and rivals that of any automaker in the business), and they are demonstrating signs of real momentum in an absolutely dreadful market. I expect Ford to be a global force to be reckoned with in this business for years to come.

Mr. Delorenzo isn’t wrong, per se. Ford’s management and products look downright promising . . . compared to the other Detroit firms. Which is like saying you’ve got the nicest Camaro in the trailer park. Meanwhile, far from the oracles of product cadence and “real momentum,” people are looking at Ford’s numbers, and the words “global force to be reckoned with” aren’t flowing off any of their keyboards.

“We are concerned that the company’s leverage may reach unsustainable levels,” Kirk Ludtke of CRT Capital Group tells Reuters. “It seems likely that Ford will need to de-lever its balance sheet by pursuing additional equity and/or debt exchanges.” Ouch. And the irony is that Ford’s recently approved government retooling loan is actually adding to Ford’s overleverage (if at a discount). JP Morgan figures the government loans will push Ford’s gross debt levels to around four times its EBITDA. And in the words of the JP Morgan report, “auto companies should not be leveraged more than 2 times.” Who knew?

But the looming threat is a $10 billion credit facility which matures in 2011, just in time for Ford’s projected return to profitability. But if another debt-for-equity-swap is in the offing, it might not go as well the second time. Ludtke gives Ford stock a “sell” rating, calling it “overvalued” at Street Insider. According to the analysis, Ford will burn $18.4 billion in the next three years. Which means the company will have to raise $7 billion in additional capital. Or, heaven forfend, take a bailout.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Matt51 Matt51 on Jun 27, 2009

    "EcoBoost" - a pathetic joke. Adding a turbo isn't anything new, and won't save the Titanic as it sinks. Sell Ford shares short. Ford can't compete with Kia, or Mazda, or Honda, or Nissan, or GM, or maybe even Chrysler. Ford is bringing nothing new to the market to help them turn around. Focus? Fusion? Taurus? Any Lincoln or Mercury product? Even the latest Ram is rated higher than F150. Massive debt, inferior product, nothing much "new" besides "EcoBoost". The crash is coming, we won't have long to wait. They fired too many engineers in Dearborn, they really resemble Chrysler. The "loss" of Vauxhall/Opel is good for GM. They are dumping their high cost plants. GMC is not dead weight. They sell a lot of product.

  • King Bojack King Bojack on Jun 27, 2009

    Matt51: Ford's increasing marketshare (no matter the reason) begs to differ with your entire opinion of the company.

  • Akila Hello Everyone, I found your blog very informative. If you want to know more about [url=
  • Michael Gallagher I agree to a certain extent but I go back to the car SUV transition. People began to buy SUVs because they were supposedly safer because of their larger size when pitted against a regular car. As more SUVs crowded the road that safety advantage began to dwindle as it became more likely to hit an equally sized SUV. Now there is no safety advantage at all.
  • Probert The new EV9 is even bigger - a true monument of a personal transportation device. Not my thing, but credit where credit is due - impressive. The interior is bigger than my house and much nicer with 2 rows of lounge seats and 3rd for the plebes. 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, around 300miles of range, and an e-mpg of 80 (90 for the 2wd). What a world.
  • Ajla "Like showroom" is a lame description but he seems negotiable on the price and at least from what the two pictures show I've dealt with worse. But, I'm not interested in something with the Devil's configuration.
  • Tassos Jong-iL I really like the C-Class, it reminds me of some trips to Russia to visit Dear Friend VladdyPoo.
Next