Volt Birth Watch 143: Did He Just Say "Under Budget"?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

In an interview with gm-volt.com, The General’s global product honcho, John Lauckner, reveals the impossible: the Volt is somehow under-budget. According to Lauckner, “. . . were [sic] very pleased that were [sic] on time on target and under budget.” After all, “you can’t ask for more than that when your running a program the size of the Volt and with the amount of technology that we’re [See? It’s not that hard] designing developing and implementing largely on the fly.” Yes, but what does “under budget” mean when you’re talking about a $40K bailout-baby green halo car?

According to Lauckner, the Volt is already successful because “the initial reaction was to question whether we were sincere or whether it was some sort of PR stunt . . . in the months and years since that point and time people have figured out that we’re very serious about this thing.” By announcing that the program is “under budget” after GM had already announced that it wouldn’t make money on the Volt “for years,” even at $40K? Sorry, GM, but “leading the conversation” doesn’t count for much if you don’t have a cost-competitive product.

As if to prove how far down the rabbit hole the Volt project has gone, Lauckner ends the exchange by asking fans to pay no attention to the year-long Volt hype. When gm-volt asks, “is there anything more at this point that could derail the Volt launch,” it’s hard to tell if Lauckner replies out of ignorance of the relentless Volt-boosting or indoctrination in it.

So far so good. All of us who have grown up in a technical community are understandably cautious about making big pronouncements when you are only part of the way there, because its always possible for something to pop up that wasn’t foreseen and so we’re naturally very cautious.

At the same time we need to be careful that our training by nature to be cautious isn’t somehow misinterpreted that we’re not optimistic and extremely pleased, because we are, more so that we’ve ever been. And were very pleased that were on time on target and under budget. You can’t ask for more than that when your running a program the size of the Volt and with the amount of technology that we’re designing developing and implementing largely on the fly.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Lw Lw on Jun 22, 2009

    So the budget was $20 Billion and they did it for $19 Billion?

  • John Horner John Horner on Jun 23, 2009

    Everyone serious who has looked at this knows and says that the Volt is not going to make any profits for GM over the next five years. So, it is in fact mostly a great big PR effort.

  • Slavuta Nissan + profitability = cheap crap
  • ToolGuy Why would they change the grille?
  • Oberkanone Nissan proved it can skillfully put new frosting on an old cake with Frontier and Z. Yet, Nissan dealers are so broken they are not good at selling the Frontier. Z production is so minimal I've yet to see one. Could Nissan boost sales? Sure. I've heard Nissan plans to regain share at the low end of the market. Kicks, Versa and lower priced trims of their mainstream SUV's. I just don't see dealerships being motivated to support this effort. Nissan is just about as exciting and compelling as a CVT.
  • ToolGuy Anyone who knows, is this the (preliminary) work of the Ford Skunk Works?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I will drive my Frontier into the ground, but for a daily, I'd go with a perfectly fine Versa SR or Mazda3.
Next