Bailout Watch 547: Michigan Pols Look for GM Plant Closing Reprieve

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Not much info here, but the story’s major thread is clear enough. After discovering that Massachusetts Congressional Representative Barney Frank won a reprieve for a local GM operation, Michigan Reps are looking for some of the same non-action for their constituents. The Detroit Free Press is uncharacteristically tight-lipped (uninformed?) about the who, when and where—although we know the what and why (staying elected). “Michigan members of Congress summoned the chief executive of General Motors Corp. to a meeting next week after the company bowed to pressure from U.S. Rep. Barney Frank and delayed the closing of a parts warehouse in his district.” The Detroit News is more forthcoming, indicating that it’s the entire Michigan congressional delegation asking for various stays. This after Dingell’s open letter to Fritz on the first . . .

Dingell throws everything against the wall.

As a Congressman who has fought hard to preserve and promote American manufacturing, with particular regard for the domestic automakers General Motors (GM), Ford, and Chrysler, I am troubled to learn that GM plans to close its Willow Run Transmission Plant in Ypsilanti Township, Michigan.

As you well know, this plant was once known as the “Arsenal of Democracy” for having built the famous B-24 bomber that helped the U.S. and its allies win the Second World War. More recently, the support of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, tax abatements by Ypsilanti Township, and an investment of $557 million by GM itself have allowed the Willow Run facility to remain an international leader in the efficient assembly of quality six-speed transmissions. When measured against GM’s internal quality scorecard, the Willow Run team assembles GM’s highest-rated transmission.

The bottom line: the people in charge of federal funds are ignoring federally-funded GM’s bottom line, dooming the zombie automaker to extinction. Well duh.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 06, 2009

    Maybe Mr. Dingell hopes we'll restart the B-24 program, and really relive the glory days?! Say, at GM maybe we should just call off this whole negative "closing the plants" idea, recall the 450,000 workers lost over the last 20 years, push 4 million cars out the door annually, and declare victory over the recession? I mean, if the bailouts are about saving jobs, let's not just save them, let's create them! @Smegley: I agree; buying a GM is a vote for these clowns.

  • Matt51 Matt51 on Jun 07, 2009

    I think Michigan can make the case to GM to keep plants operating there. They can weight the economics of operating in Michigan vs elsewhere, and make concessions to GM. In the end, Michigan has to persuade GM it is more economical to be in Michigan than elsewhere. It may take some state subsidy, but this is doable. Let the discussions between Michigan and GM begin.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next