VW/Porsche: Auto Union? What the NSFW?
Just got off the phone with my copyright lawyer. “Bertel, how many times do I have to tell you that ideas are not copyrightable.” “Yes, Sidney, I know, only the expression. But it’s a shame nonetheless.” There goes my last chance to get rich. What happened?
According to the pistonheads at Pistonheads.com, history goes into high RPMs again at Volkswagen. Due to the impending merger of Volkswagen and Porsche (which more and more looks like a takeover of Porsche by Piech) the company might need a new name. After all, Volkswagen-Porsche would sound unwieldy and would bring up memories of the ill-fated Volksporsche 914. Anyway, a holding company shouldn’t carry the name of one of its brands in its name (save for Ford, or Toyota, and many others.) The names of two brands in the name of one holding would be a bit too much. So someone floated a bright idea:
How about Auto Union? Says Pistonheads: “The historic Auto Union name, made famous by the successful 1930s grand prix cars, could be revived and used by the new Porsche-VW alliance when the two automotive powerhouses merge later in the year.” Volkswagen still owns that brand, they bought Auto Union AG from Daimler Benz in 1964, along with Audi and NSU. Only Audi remained. Auto Union, established 1932 in Chemnitz, was an amalgamation of Horch, Audi, DKW and Wanderer. The four rings survived in the Audi logo.
Piech likes the Auto Union idea, says Pistonheads. “The decision, however, may be scuppered by the Nazi associations the Auto Union name carries. Despite being established in 1932, well before the rise of Hitler, the Auto Union brand came to symbolize the engineering aspirations of Nazi Germany.”
Boy, are they ever wrong.
In 1975, after Toni Schmücker had taken the helm at VW, Volkswagen already looked for a new name. They envisaged having many brands (which, as we all know, came to pass,) and they needed a name for the holding company. Many names were floated. I was involved in the project and said: “How about Auto Union?”
What was the answer? “Bertel, are you out of your frikken mind? We’ve already got enough unions. We don’t need one in the name of our company.”
Instead, the notorious V.A.G was born. First as the name for the combined distribution organization, and the subsidiaries, such as V.A.G Leasing, V.A.G Bank etc. I objected loudly. Remember, us Germans have problems with pronouncing the “V,” it sometimes comes across as an “F” or as a “W.” In the case of V.A.G it sounded like “FAG” – not as the homosexual version. With the “G” pronounced as a Teutonic “K,” it sounded, well, like “FUCK” (a.k.a. NSFW).
“You can’t give an effing name to the effing company,” I objected.
“Bertel, we all know you have a dirty mind,” they said. “It’s not FUCK. It’s Vau-Ah-Geh.” And so the effing organization received its effing name. In 1992, V.A.G was quietly euthanized. V.A.G lives on in the V.A.G Rounded typeface, which became popular on the Apple iBook and many other products.
I insist that Auto Union would have been much better as the name for the holding company in 1975, and it would do just fine today as well. Even the Metallarbeitergewerkschaft and the UAW would love it. But I doubt it will be taken. For the same reasons it was shot down in the late 70s.
Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.
More by Bertel Schmitt
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Bruce Purchased (in 2024) a 1989 Camero RS. I wasn't looking for one but I picked it up for 1500. I wanted to only pay 800 but the fellow I bought it from had a real nice family and I could tell they loved each other. They needed the money and I had to give it to him. I felt my heart grow like the Grinch. Yes it has the little 2.8. But the write up does not represent this car. It has never been messed with, all original, a real time machine. I was very fond of these 3rd gen Cameros. It was very oxidized but straight, interior was dirty but all there. I just retired and I parked in my shop and looked at it for 5 months. I couldn't decide how to approach it now That I can afford to make of it what ever I want. Resto mod? Engine swap? No reason to expect any finacial return. Finally I started just doing little things. Buffed and polished the paint. Tune up, Fluids. I am still working it and have found a lot of joy in just restoring what I have just the way I found it just fixed and cleaned up. It's just a cool looking cruiser, fun to drive, fun to figure out. It is what it is. I am keeping it and the author of this critical write up completely misses the point. Mabey the point is what I make it. Nothing more and nothing less.
- George Now that the Spark And Pretty Soon Gone is the Mirage I really wonder how are you going to get A low rental price when getting a loaner car for the week or more? Cars that are big as spark usually cost 5 to 10 dollars a day for use in a week rental agreement.Where as a SUV like a Equinox or a Rogue Midsize SUV would cost about 20 to 30 dollars for the same length of time of lease and since you’re getting more space leasing is going to be very expensive.
- Mcs Tesla Full Self Driving will be working flawlessly about 10 years after fusion reactors are perfected. That's my prediction and I'm sticking to it.
- Akear American consumers have clearly stated they don't want neither rebadged Alfa Romeos or Fiats. The hornet is over stocked for nearly 400 days!
- FreedMike I do tip my cap to Musk for at least talking about pushing the edge technologically. But I'm betting no on this question, at least for the near-term future. This vehicle requires two technologies - no-driver-control autonomous driving and inductive charging - that aren't nearly mature enough right now, and they can't be willed into maturity by Musk.
Comments
Join the conversation
How about "Clusterf*ck" for the new name?