Chrysler to Spend $244m Bailout Bucks to Get $244m DOE Handout to Build 365 $1m Prototype EVs

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Does this sound strange to you: Chrysler proposes spending $224 million of your tax money (bailout bucks) to land another $244 million of your tax money (Department of Energy green bucks). They plan on using the money to develop and, yes, build electric vehicles. Volt Envi much? Hang on; is the DOE money a “grant” or a “loan”? I mean, in all this $100 billion bailout excitement, has everyone forgotten about the $25 billion Department of Energy retooling loans? Is this deal part of that deal or the billion dollar battery research thing? Anyway, Reuters doesn’t say from whence cometh this particular part of the feds’ attempt to fix Motown’s meltdown. But they do put quote marks around Chrysler’s “partners” (you and Fiat sitting in a tree?) and parrot the zombie automaker’s enviro-agitprop without question.

“Chrysler and its ‘partners,’ plus the Department of Energy, would pay $224 million each should the proposals be approved and would include an investment of up to $83 million to build a new technology and manufacturing center in Michigan to help develop and assemble these vehicles. That complex should be functional by 2010 and produce more than 20,000 vehicles a year, Chrysler said.” Right. Like we believe anything Chrysler says. But they should have at least mentioned the number of “green jobs” (TTAC hearts quote marks) the project would create. C’mon guys, get some game going! Saying that, you gotta love this little tidbit . . .

The plan would also include $365 million for a national demonstration fleet of more than 365 test vehicles for select customers and partners.

Holy shit! A million dollars a pop! Now that kind of proposal takes some serious balls. You know; for a bankrupt car company living on Uncle Sam’s dime. Props.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • U mad scientist U mad scientist on May 27, 2009
    The market will correct itself if only the government would stay away. You don't seem to get that without a gov, there would be no "market" that you speak of, unless you were mostly into trading beads.
  • Joeaverage Joeaverage on May 29, 2009

    Haven't we been down this expensive gov't funded vehicle program before? Tech that never reaches the consumer? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_Precept http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_a_New_Generation_of_Vehicles Why not concentrate on infrastructure projects instead of supporting car manufacturers that are failing? Fix bridges, schools, neighborhoods. That shovel-ready BS they were talking about until recently. Why not green projects like solar and wind and whatever. For the price of the bailouts for Detroit and the banks the gov't could run around and put solar on every gov't rooftop across the nation and employ alot of people doing it. That's long term thinking - not can we turn a big profit next year at the detriment of the following five years...

  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
  • Jeff This is a step in the right direction with the Murano gaining a 9 speed automatic. Nissan could go a little further and offer a compact pickup and offer hybrids. VoGhost--Nissan has  laid out a new plan to electrify 16 of the 30 vehicles it produces by 2026, with the rest using internal combustion instead. For those of us in North America, the company says it plans to release seven new vehicles in the US and Canada, although it’s not clear how many of those will be some type of EV.Nissan says the US is getting “e-POWER and plug-in hybrid models” — each of those uses a mix of electricity and fuel for power. At the moment, the only all-electric EVs Nissan is producing are the  Ariya SUV and the  perhaps endangered (or  maybe not) Leaf.In 2021, Nissan said it would  make 23 electrified vehicles by 2030, and that 15 of those would be fully electric, rather than some form of hybrid vehicle. It’s hard to say if any of this is a step forward from that plan, because yes, 16 is bigger than 15, but Nissan doesn’t explicitly say how many of those 16 are all-battery, or indeed if any of them are.  https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/25/24111963/nissan-ev-plan-2026-solid-state-batteries
  • Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
  • Jkross22 Ford already has an affordable EV. 2 year old Mach-E's are extraordinarily affordable.
  • Lou_BC How does the lower case "armada" differ from the upper case "Armada"?
Next