Bailout Watch 500: Chrysler to Fiat, Feds: It's All Yours!

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

CEO Bob Nardelli is punting. Boot ‘Em Bob has told the troops that Chrysler would cede control of its board and senior management to Fiat if the two automakers “merge.” “The U.S. government and Fiat would appoint a board of directors for Chrysler, with a majority of them independent directors who are not employees of either automaker,” Nardelli said in an internal memo intercepted by Reuters. “The board will have the responsibility to appoint a chairman. The board also will select a CEO with Fiat’s concurrence.” Seeing as Nardelli walked away from Home Depot with over $240 million in severance pay, one wonders how much it would cost management (that’s Uncle Sam now) to get rid of him this time ’round. Cerberus exits stage right. American Leyland enters stage left. Anyway, here’s the weird part: Reuters is a bit more specific about the government’s participation in this newly formed Chrysler Board than Automotive News, even though Reuters credits Automotive News for the info.

The two automakers are discussing a new seven-member board for Chrysler that would include representatives from Fiat and possibly President Barack Obama’s automotive task force overseeing the restructuring of the auto industry, Automotive News reported, citing sources close to the negotiations.

Also among the options under discussion is a direct role in Chrysler’s operations for Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne, possibly even the chief executive’s job, according to the report.

Only Automotive News [sub] puts it slightly differently (at least in the latest version):

The U.S. government and Fiat would appoint a board of directors for Chrysler, with a majority of them independent directors who are not employees of either automaker, Nardelli said in an internal memo to workers obtained by Reuters.

Hmmmm.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • FromBrazil FromBrazil on Apr 18, 2009

    @Pch101 You're probably right, but this no money from them is probably the best stance to get as much TARP money as possible. Don't you think?

  • Pch101 Pch101 on Apr 19, 2009
    this no money from them is probably the best stance to get as much TARP money as possible. Sure. As I said earlier, I would do the same thing if I were in Fiat's position. It's a good negotiation tactic for them to use, and I'm not surprised to see them do it as this stage of the negotiation. It's up to the US government to play hardball here. My guess is that they'll play softball instead, and Fiat's required contribution will be lower than it probably should be, but something greater than zero.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
  • Formula m Same as Ford, withholding billions in development because they want to rearrange the furniture.
  • EV-Guy I would care more about the Detroit downtown core. Who else would possibly be able to occupy this space? GM bought this complex - correct? If they can't fill it, how do they find tenants that can? Is the plan to just tear it down and sell to developers?
  • EBFlex Demand is so high for EVs they are having to lay people off. Layoffs are the ultimate sign of an rapidly expanding market.
  • Thomas I thought about buying an EV, but the more I learned about them, the less I wanted one. Maybe I'll reconsider in 5 or 10 years if technology improves. I don't think EVs are good enough yet for my use case. Pricing and infrastructure needs to improve too.
Next