Bailout Watch 426: VEBA Equity Deal Could Give UAW 25 Percent Of Ford

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Covering Detroit’s massive health care liabilities is perhaps the single greatest challenge facing those working on the auto industry bailout, reports the Washington Post. Detroit retirees in particular represent a huge commitment, as current health care benefits include dental, vision and prescription drug benefits for the low price of $11 per month. And as the automakers burn through their cash, they must come up with some way of maintaining or cutting benefits in the face of rising health care costs. GM currently carries $20B in health care obligations, over ten times its market capitalization. Chrysler owes $10B and Ford owes $3.2B of its total $13.2B VEBA commitment this year alone. With bailout plans calling for automakers to inject equity rather than tight cash into the VEBA system, a number of unintended consequences are being forecast.

In GM’s case, the biggest challenge is avoiding stock price degradation. At ten times its current market cap, GM must not only reduce the amount of equity it is being asked to put into VEBA, it must also convince investors that the VEBA deal will leave GM stronger than it was. Otherwise, GM’s already threatened stock could become a target for sell-offs. Especially considering it has over $30B in unsecured debt that it must also convert into equity. Needless to say these kinds of radical equity restructurings are rarely attempted, let alone completed, outside of bankruptcy court.

In the case of Ford, thedetroitbureau.com reports that the $1.6B that Dearborn must fork over in equity is equal to 25 percent of the company’s stock. This would make the VEBA board a major stockholder in Ford, a possibility that wories many. Five of the VEBA board’s 11 members are UAW members, and the other six are subject to union review. According to Steve Diamond, a professor of law at Santa Clara University [Ed. Go Broncos!] in California, the VEBA board is an opaque institution with a record of incomplete disclosure. Moreover, says Diamond, the union shouldn’t be allowed to negotiate the terms of VEBA. VEBA trustees “are the only ones that should have a say over the cash flow into the fund,” he argues.

In short, the Detroit automakers still owe more in union health care obligations alone than they are worth on the open market. And even with plans to put equity into VEBA instead of cash, and with the union accepting a 50 percent payout, this single obligation could bring any of the Detroit firms down. Or place them under union control. Needless to say, only bankruptcy proceedings can unburden the automakers fom this ruinous debt.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Robert Schwartz Robert Schwartz on Mar 03, 2009

    "GM’s already threatened stock could become a target for sell-offs." Been there, done that, T-shirt. $2/shr. What difference does it make? Ford. The Ford Family owns stock with multiple votes per share. Having 25% of the outstanding public shares which get one vote per share, gives a right to buy coffee for $1.50 at McDonalds.

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Mar 08, 2009

    [...] Source: thetruthaboutcars.com [...]

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next