Nobody Out-Gimmicks The General

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Also file under “what else do you say when sales drop 52.9 percent?” Automotive News [sub] sifted out a tasty nugget from GM’s latest sales conference call kabuki. “We’ve looked at Hyundai’s ( Assurance) program extensively, and we’ve examined some possibilities of what we might do because certainly the consumer is anxious and worried about the future and whether or not they will retain their job,” was how GM’s Mark LaNeve put it. Interesting. But, continues the GM marketing chief, “we’re not crazy about the Hyundai program.” Because it’s made of kimchee? No, “because all it does is protect your credit from being wrecked. You’ve still got to turn in your car. And when you lose your job, you still need a car to find another job.” GM’s answer: build the gimmick that fixes everything. Of course.

But wait. A GM spokesman also tells AN that “we aren’t interested in following Hyundai’s Assurance program exactly because we’re not sure how effective it really is.” Rest assured though, your tax dollars are being spent as we speak, paying GM’s finest minds to figure out whether Hyundai’s sales mojo is based on Assurance or cash on the hood. Deciding, as it were, whether to chase Hyundai’s gimmickry or Chrysler’s incentive frenzy.

“That said,” continues GM’s spokesman, hitting Bushian heights, “we think there’s something there that addresses consumer confidence, and that’s the area we’re looking at: Can we do something that addresses consumer confidence?” After all, GM can only continue already existing Presidents Day sale incentives into March. The big deal? “GM will use the TV time it bought during the NCAA basketball tournament to promote its product message more than a sale.” Because that way you still have a car when you lose your job. Oh wait.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Mar 04, 2009

    guyincognito-The "Housing and Vehicle Entitlement" plan will simply be an expansion of the plan FDR instituted in the '30s. Bunter

  • Yankinwaoz Yankinwaoz on Mar 05, 2009

    I would be interested in the fine print of the walk-away plan. I suspect that there are enough weasel clauses in there that no one could ever qualify for benefits. Has Consumer Reports or some other consumer watch-dog or state insurance board reviewed this and issued a reality report? For example, if you work in a specialized field (such as I.T.), does that fact that you turned down a $4/hr job delivering pizzas while you looked for more appropriate work disqualify you from benefits?

  • Lou_BC No. An EV would have to replace my primary vehicle. That means it has to be able to do everything my current vehicle does.
  • Bkojote @Lou_BC I don't know how broad of a difference in capability there is between 2 door and 4 door broncos or even Wranglers as I can't speak to that from experience. Generally the consensus is while a Tacoma/4Runner is ~10% less capable on 'difficult' trails they're significantly more pleasant to drive on the way to the trails and actually pleasant the other 90% of the time. I'm guessing the Trailhunter narrows that gap even more and is probably almost as capable as a 4 Door Bronco Sasquatch but significantly more pleasant/fuel efficient on the road. To wit, just about everyone in our group with a 4Runner bought a second set of wheels/tires for when it sees road duty. Everyone in our group with a Bronco bought a second vehicle...
  • Aja8888 No.
  • 2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
  • Cla65691460 April 24 (Reuters) - A made-in-China electric vehicle will hit U.S. dealers this summer offering power and efficiency similar to the Tesla Model Y, the world's best-selling EV, but for about $8,000 less.
Next