Ford Makes Offer On $10.4b In Long-Term Debt

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Dow Jones [via CNN Money] reports that FoMoCo and Ford Credit are prepared to drop precious cash to coax debt holders into converting their notes into Ford stock. Gory details of the deal are below the fold, but numerous sources are confirming that this debt restructuring is a condition for VEBA to accept company stock per its recent agreement. Plus it’s kind of an awesome PR move, in an “eat the weakest first” way. Ford is out doing all the things GM and Chrysler should have done: going to the mats with the UAW and restructuring long-term debt. The two firms actually receiving bailout money dither it away while playing catchup. Of course this doesn’t mean Ford is out of the woods yet, as $10.4B is less than half of Ford’s $25.8B pile o‘ debt. Plus, nobody has actually accepted the offer yet either.

According to Dow Jones, Ford is asking holders of “Outstanding 4.25% senior convertible notes due Dec. 15, 2036, to convert about $4.9 billion in convertible notes. Holders who elect to convert the note into shares of Ford common stock will receive 108 shares of Ford common stock plus $80 in cash for each $1,000 principal amount converted.”

Also, “Ford Motor Credit, its wholly-owned finance arm, has commenced a $1.3 billion cash tender offer to purchase Ford’s unsecured, nonconvertible debt securities, of which about $8.9 billion aggregate principal amount is outstanding. The finance arm also has started a separate $500 million cash offer to buy Ford’s senior secured term-loan debt. The term offer will be conducted through a “dutch auction” under which term-loan lenders will be invited to submit bids to sell their term-loan debt.”

And if that ain’t enough minutiae for ya, know this. Ford also announced its intent to exercise its right to defer future dividend payments on the 6.50 percent cumulative trust preferred securities of Ford Motor Company Capital Trust II beginning in April.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Runfromcheney Runfromcheney on Mar 05, 2009

    windswords: I didn't think it was a "genius" move, but it is a good example of Ford being ahead of the game and actually trying. GM AFAIK didn't start trying to convert debt into equity until they were running on government funds. So it is just an example of how Ford is trying to restructure instead of just doing nothing then expecting us to keep them alive just because they employ a lot of people. Like some OTHER automakers.

  • Dpeppers Dpeppers on Mar 06, 2009

    runfromcheney They are doing as they were told. They met with the "Task Force". They were told to get ahead of the game, because they are running out of money. They are following the pattern of assistance laid out by the task force. If you can't see the coincidence of the two, then I hope this has helped. Ford is in the same bucket with the rest of them foriegn and domestic. This last man standing crap isn't going ot happen. We are at a cliff staring at the abyss when it comes to cars sales. there is no company on earth that came adjust quickly enough. Honda may be the shining light (small enough to be flexible enough).

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next