New U.S. Transport Sec. Ray LaHood Named "Porker of the Month"

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The taxpayer advocacy group Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) has named U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray H. LaHood its “ January 2009 Porker of the Month.” “In his new position, Secretary LaHood will preside over the distribution of tens of billions of tax dollars for transportation projects in the stimulus package that is moving forward in Congress,” the group said in a statement. “As a member of Congress from Illinois between 1995 and 2009, then-Rep. LaHood made the most of his seat on the House Appropriations Committee and over time became adept at spending more and more of the taxpayers’ money… For his long-standing disregard for the taxpayers’ money and an abundance of concern over how he will administer the Department of Transportation, CAGW names Ray LaHood January Porker of the Month.”


The group pointed to the fifty-two legislative earmarks for which LaHood took credit last year, totaling $58.9m in spending. For example, he diverted $448,000 in federal tax dollars to the Lakeview Museum Planetarium in Peoria, Illinois.

According to The Washington Post‘s, LaHood’s campaign contributors are beneficiaries of his adroitness in the earmark department. Peoria-based Caterpillar tendered LaHood’s campaign $190k while receiving $7.8m in earmarks. The road-building company United Contractors Midwest and the Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association were also among LaHood’s top campaign donors. In return, LaHood secured $2m in paving earmarks on their behalf. And those are just ’08’s totals.

LaHood defends earmarks as part of the normal legislative process.

“The reason I went to the Appropriations Committee, the reason other people go on the Appropriations Committee, is they know that it puts them in a position to know where the money is at, to know the people who are doling the money out and to be in the room when the money is being doled out,” LaHood told the Rockford Register Star in a February 2, 2008, article.

CAGW issues annual ratings that score members of Congress on their spending restraint. In his last year of office, LaHood rated 11 out of 100.

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Kurt. Kurt. on Feb 03, 2009

    In this month issue of American Motorcyclist, the AMA membership magazine, a reader points out that his area has 300+ miles of roadways paid for by local government. Their budget is $1.8m annually. It costs $105,000 to pave one mile, so they can pave 17 miles per year. Assfault has a life expectancy of 7 to 10 years (we all know it is 3 to 5) so that puts the roads in his area on a 21 year repaving cycle. I bring all this up because although I dislike how some members of Congress get more for their constituents than others, it is why we sent them there. The important thing for us to do is hold them accountable for the spending of that money once in comes (back) to us.

  • Geeber Geeber on Feb 03, 2009
    carlos.negros: What exactly is wrong with a Planetarium? There is one in my home town. Absolutely nothing. The correct question is whether the federal government should be paying for them. The correct answer is that if the residents of your town enjoy it, they can also pay for it. carlos.negros: Why is this a worse way to invest than buying a new jet for Citigroup? That's an argument against bailouts without sufficient conditions attached, not an argument for federal funding of planetariums. carlos.negros: Or, for that matter, why is it worse than giving a billion to faith-based initiatives? Because the organizations that receive funds must meet specific guidelines, and can only use the money to provide services that meet critical needs in the community. Planetariums are nice, but the last time I checked, they aren't critical to the needs of a community. Please compare apples to apples next time.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next