Bailout Watch 385: The Weaseling Begins

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The Detroit News reports that GM and Chrysler are working furiously behind the scenes to extend the March 31 government deadline re: meeting the conditions of their $13.4b bridge loan to nowhere bailout buffet. Surprise! The American automakers’ inability to take responsibility for their actions may be true-to-form, but that doesn’t make it any less nauseating. Nor does the News’ coverage of the company’s weaseling, which put the “sick” in “sycophancy.” The only satisfaction to be had from this lede is the use of the word “scurrying.”

As General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC are scurrying to put the finishing touches on their restructuring plans due next Tuesday to the Treasury, finance and auto industry experts say submitting plans is one thing, but getting bondholders and all other parties involved in a massive restructuring to agree to those plans by the March 31 deadline seems unrealistic.

Pass the Alka Seltzer, here we go . . .

“I wouldn’t be surprised if the timetable got extended, because clearly the original plan was a temporary fix,” said Mark Oline, a Fitch Ratings analyst in Chicago. “It was going to be up to the new Congress and Administration to put in a longer-term solution.

Auto analysts and bankruptcy lawyers say the deadline set out in the federal bailout of the automakers is too ambitious to get bondholders on board in just a few more weeks. They say GM in particular needs an extension to avoid being forced into bankruptcy if it can’t show progress on its assignment to cut $27.5 billion of unsecured debt down to about $9.2 billion by the end of March.

So Detroit-friendly analysts are in the tank for Chrysler and GM. Surprise! Well here’s something worth considering: if there’s no “real” deadline, why should any of GM’s bondholders negotiate? They already crossed that bridge to nowhere during the GMAC debacle, when the feds ignored their own deadline and conditions for the then-lender’s (i.e., not bank) debt-for-equity swap, and dumped in $6b instead. Do you think GM and Chrysler bondholders didn’t learn that lesson? Cough. Pimco. Cough. And so GM CEO Rick Wagoner is down in DC doing what he does best [hint: it’s not building profitable vehicles].

GM’s Wagoner is working to smooth the reception of its plan with a series of meetings in Washington today, including one with the new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

And the automaker is banking on the fact the loan agreements only require “commencement” of the exchange and not completion.

“So you have time. It’s not like everything is going to be done and buttoned up,” GM Chief Operating Officer Fritz Henderson said to reporters in January. “But we have to have preliminary plans by that time.”

Note to the DetN and our elected representatives: a plan to have a plan is not a plan. Not really. Not if you think about it.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • TheRealAutoGuy TheRealAutoGuy on Feb 10, 2009
    "Note to the DetN and our elected representatives: a plan to have a plan is not a plan. Not really. Not if you think about it." [modest chuckle] Minimally witty, but untrue. "Plans are nothing. Planning is everything." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower. The battlefield is changing faster than the plans can be drawn up. If one cannot see this, then one has not been watching. The plans WILL change because they reflect a changing reality. Anything else would be irresponsible.
  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Feb 11, 2009

    tesla deathwatcher-good points, I had not thought about that difference. Bunter

  • Analoggrotto Ford wishes it could be Hyundai Kia Genesis.
  • John I used to have a 2016 Chevy Spark EV (leased, 85 miles range when new) as our family's 3rd car. Loved it. When the lease ended the only cheap EV was the bolt but I couldn't stomach the tuperware interior so I bought a used Cayman instead and have been waiting now for another a cheap EV for almost 5 years. My bigger problem would be that I dislike giving Elon Musk even more $$, but the tesla supercharger network makes long trips (within CA at least) an option.
  • SCE to AUX "...it’s unclear how Ford plans to reach profitability with cheaper vehicles, as it’s slowed investments in new factories and other related areas"Exactly. They need to show us their Gigafactories that will support the high-demand affordable EV volume.
  • 1995 SC I have a "Hooptie" EV. Affordable would be a step up.
  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
Next