Who's Buying All That Brilliance Stock, And Why?

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The Hong Kong Stock Exchange announced that the board of directors of Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited ” has noted the increase in share price and trading volume of the shares of the Company today and wishes to state that the Board is not aware of any reasons for such increase in share price and trading volume.”

Brilliance, BMW’s Chinese joint venture partner and maker of its own line of cars (which kind of look like Bimmers) “confirms that there are no negotiations or agreements relating to intended acquisitions or realizations which are discloseable.” In other words: They say they have no idea why their stock would move.

We called around a bit in China. Everybody is likewise flabbergasted. A source we trust, and which shall remain undisclosed to protect his job, says: “There is nothing unusual going on at Brilliance. They will announce some homegrown new models this year. No new BMW joint venture cars are planned.” So why the sudden interest in their stock?

It’s not that Brilliance’s sales record was too stellar. According to Gasgoo, “Brilliance Auto has met with its all-time slow in car sales. The company has sold only 285,000 vehicles in 2008, with its sales growth down 5 percent from last year.”

In 2005, Brilliance tried to export Bimmer-a-likes into the Hornet’s nest Germany. Hans Sachs, a former VW exec, launched an import company and ran into heavy fire. Imported Brilliances were crash tested (some say under a bit dubious circumstances) and failed miserably. Videos on YouTube. Death knell. A later test in Spain was ok, but the damage was done. A marketing consultant, asked for help by Sachs, recommended: “Put the cars on a ship and head for the biggest hurricane you can find.”

Yet, Brilliance hasn’t given up and calls it “a learning exercise.” They will be at the Detroit Auto Show, where they will put “nearly ready for US” cars on display. But again, who’s aggressively buying their shares and why? One wild assed guess is that it might be the hellhound itself. Cerberus. In order to have something to sell through their dealerships. They could buy TKD (kit cars) from Brilliance, assemble them in Mexico or in their disused Delaware plant and call them “Made in the U.S.A.”

It’s a far fetched assumption, but as the assumptee says, “funnier things have happened.” But why buy the shares if they just can buy the kits? Brilliance would be glad to sell them.


Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Jan 08, 2009

    @menno: Now that makes certainly sense. By the way, my sources say the Brilliances are not all that bad. The Bimmers they build are built with original Bavarian technology in plants devised by BMW and to BMW standards. For their homegrowns, they just need to get more inspired by how BMW constructs a safety cell, and not forget stuff like putting cross members into the doors etc., and they'll be right there. With a little input from a big company that has the computer simulators needed to build cars, their safety problems could be solved in a few months. I'm sure Chrysler has a lot of unused computer cycles to trade ...

  • Moneygetter Moneygetter on Oct 20, 2009

    The owner of the Houston rockets invested 100 million in Brilliance. That is who is buying all of that brilliance stock. He also has 50 years of experience in the auto industry.

  • SCE to AUX "we had an unprecedented number of visits to the online configurator"Nobody paid attention when the name was "Milano", because it was expected. Mission accomplished!
  • Parkave231 Should have changed it to the Polonia!
  • Analoggrotto Junior Soprano lol
  • GrumpyOldMan The "Junior" name was good enough for the German DKW in 1959-1963:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DKW_Junior
  • Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
Next