UAW Ready to Pretend to Make Concessions. Or Not.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Right. Let’s have it. I’m going to ask a simple question, and I’m honest-to-God ready, willing and able to hear some new information. What concessions has the United Auto Workers (UAW) ever made to the American automakers? Forget the much-ballyhooed “two tier” wage system. All that means is that new hires don’t get paid as much as the old hires. As there are no new hires, and the theoretical new hires aren’t “conceding” anything they already had, and I’ll bet the UAW’s not cutting their union dues to compensate for the reduced wage structure, I reckon that simply doesn’t qualify. Layoff? Layoffs aren’t concessions– especially when UAW members are paid 85 percent of their salary for not working. Buyouts? Not a concession. The only genuine concession I can think of: the new-for-’07 health co-pay, which stands at $252 in annual premiums for family coverage and another $500 in total annual deductibles. AND there’s a company (not union) fund to cover workers who can’t afford it. The idea that the UAW will concede anything without compensation raises all the usual questions about leopards and spots. But if you’d like to see how the game is played, make the jump for the Detroit News’ properganda [sic].

“The Bush administration’s restructuring targets include reducing debt by two-thirds via a debt for equity exchange, requiring the UAW to accept half of the health care trust fund payments payable to the union from the automakers in 2010 in stock rather than cash, and new factory work rules and wages that are competitive with foreign automakers by the end of 2009.”

Well, one out of three might happen: stock into the eminently lootable Health Care VEBA superfund instead of cash. But probably not, as GM retirees aren’t as stupid as the UAW bosses and GM would like them to be. They’ve already made noises that they don’t want no stinkin’ shares in General Motors. But I reckon Big Ron Gettelfinger could shove that one down their collective throats (so to speak).

But never mind that. If I wasn’t writing this blog, this Robert Snell insight would be my Quote of the Day: “Talks with the UAW could be tricky, and any concessions GM gets will be sought by rivals Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler.”

Although the scribe does get to the meat of the matter: “UAW President Ron Gettelfinger has vowed to work with the Obama administration to remove terms of the loan deal that require GM and Chrysler to drastically cut wages and benefits.”

So the UAW is going to make concession that President Obama will then dismiss? I don’t think so.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Lokki Lokki on Jan 06, 2009
    I will only buy UAW/CAW built vehicles from now on. Where were you when they needed you Davey49? Anybody can buy one for almost nothing now..... hurry while they're still around.
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Jan 19, 2009

    We the UAW have gave up much. We have gave away Health care and pensions in the last contract. We now work under Japanese work ethics. We agreed to profit sharing and in return GM spent all their monies on Fiat and Hughes aircraft in order to not have profits to share and then lost billions trying to avert giving us anything. This is not about GM. Chrysler,Ford or any other American company. This is about GREED. The BIG BOYS have decided that they are going to put the USA into a DEPRESSION by moving industries out of USA and then also shipping in foreign goods. This one two punch will bring the USA to its knees because the common american doesnt understand the fact that if you dont have business then there is NO JOBS, Also if you have a job it will be UNDERMINED by foreign interests for cheaper wages no matter what your function.AMERCA will continue to sink in the QUICKSAND until someone wakes up the American people to their stupidity. In the end no matter who you are and what your education is in the USA if you are from the USA you will be seen as inferior by foreign counterparts. THUS if our so called GOVERNMENT does not put a stop to this,our country is headed for a third world status. We will then be an agricultural based country. Yes and guess who now owns most agricultural farms in USA and also owns rights to all HYBRID plants to feed the growing and affluent masses in china and abroad. YES the BIG BOYS.If WE as AMERICANS ever needed a UNION it is NOW and we should all UNITE to keep EMPLOYMENT in the USA. WE can only do this by SUPPORTING ourselves not DEGRADING each other.

  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
  • Jeff Tesla should not be allowed to call its system Full Self-Driving. Very dangerous and misleading.
  • Slavuta America, the evil totalitarian police state
Next