New 2010 Ford Taurus: Can It Break D Curse?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago
Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 45 comments
  • Ronald Ronald on Jan 11, 2009

    50merc: I have noticed the narrow footwell in my Taurus (I thought it was due to some peculiarity of the Volvo-derived frame . . .. I could easily be wrong). I am used to it now, and it was not an issue on my long trip. My concern is with the angling of the dashboard in combination with the huge center console (in combination, perhaps, with the aforementioned narrow footwell), one could end up feeling rather confined in the 2010 Taurus.

  • Johnster Johnster on Jan 12, 2009
    50merc : re you referring to the complaints others have made of the Five Hundred/Taurus’ tight quarters in the footwells? Maybe the provision for 4WD required extra room for mechanical gear. My impression is that this would be uncomfortable on a long trip. I'm not sure what ronald is referring to, but I hear lots of complaints from tall drivers that they hit their knees against the sides of the center console.
  • Cpmanx Cpmanx on Jan 12, 2009

    Some clumsiness in the design (that C pillar, that bifurcated character line), and I'm not a fan of the new lower roof/higher beltline. That said, look at what the new Taurus is squaring off against: Maxima (clumsy), Impala (way clumsy), Avalon (way way clumsy). Still, this was a chance to be a knockout. Looking good--in this shrinking segment, in this dead market--may not be good enough.

  • Luke Luke on Jan 12, 2009

    Nice looking car. From certain angles it has a real presence. I actually like the rear end best. The interior looks really nice. I can't wait to see it in person.

Next