Motown Pensions Warning

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The Detroit News and The Wall Street Journal are reporting that Motown automakers’ pensions funds are no longer fully-funded. “The outgoing director of the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. warned Friday that Detroit’s Big Three automakers face a $41 billion pension shortfall. “We’re not trying to tell people that the pension house is on fire,” quoth E.F. Millard in the DetN. “The point is that in many ways this has a similar look to other situations, such as a Bethlehem Steel.” Not surprisingly, the WSJ has an even more alarming sound bite. “An awful lot of people seem to think these plans are well funded or overfunded. Each of these plans is significantly underfunded [and] in three years I don’t want people coming back and saying, ‘How come the PBGC never told us that?'” Let’s drill down, then.

The three automakers reported $130.5 billion in pension assets, which represents only 76 percent of their combined liabilities. GM’s pension is 20 percent underfunded, Chrysler’s is 34 percent underfunded, and Ford is short by 27 percent.”

“When GM last gave a year-end update on its pension funds, the funds covered more than 400,000 retirees and were overfunded by $18.8 billion. But in November, GM said its plan for hourly workers was underfunded by $500 million because of restructuring expenses.”

So where did the money go? Heavy losses in investment portfolios, declining interest rates on assets and (as stated above) Detroit’s reliance on pension funds to pay for early retirement.

“It is certainly possible that none of these companies ever files for bankruptcy,” Millard said. “It is certainly possible that they all do.” He said the risk to the PCBG’s reserves is “significantly greater than it was six or seven months ago.’

And then…?

“If all three automakers were to collapse and turn their plans over to the pension corporation, the agency estimates it would pay out $13 billion of the $41 billion, because of limits set by Congress on how much the pension corporation can cover. The agency generally has a yearly cap of $54,000 in benefits for people who are 65.”

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • 50merc 50merc on Jan 10, 2009

    "The agency generally has a yearly cap of $54,000 in benefits for people who are 65." Well, that might mean a sizable disappointment for some D3 retirees, but the vast majority of Americans in that age bracket would be jubilant to get that much. One thing to reflect upon: this is the first time in human history that people have come to expect to quit working while still healthy and able, and enjoy a comfortable income (for many years!) to boot.

  • Jerry weber Jerry weber on Jan 11, 2009

    Look, the law of unintneded consequences or kicking the can down the road prevails here. Every; time you early retire thousands of employees with lucrative buyouts, you are saving some money today for future costs later. None of these plans envisioned people leaving at the age of say 50. And worse, none of these pension plans called for a company of say 1/3 it;s former size having to wrestle with more retiress than workers.The only reason Social Security is not broke right now is that uncle sam still has more people paying in on the payroll then they did before.(I understand that the proportion of workers to retirees is less, but the real numbers of workers is still rising)

  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
  • Formula m Same as Ford, withholding billions in development because they want to rearrange the furniture.
  • EV-Guy I would care more about the Detroit downtown core. Who else would possibly be able to occupy this space? GM bought this complex - correct? If they can't fill it, how do they find tenants that can? Is the plan to just tear it down and sell to developers?
  • EBFlex Demand is so high for EVs they are having to lay people off. Layoffs are the ultimate sign of an rapidly expanding market.
Next