Editorial: General Motors Death Watch 226: First to Blink

Ken Elias
by Ken Elias

First to blink, first to lose. That’s what GM’s creditors know. As does Ron Gettelfinger, the United Auto Workers (UAW) boss. And that’s why there isn’t enough time between now and February 17th– the congressional deadline for the next federal loan installment for GM– for General Motors to craft a workable deal to save this company. No one is going to blink. So no one will cave, and nothing gets done. Then what?

The loan terms of the bailout specified a raft of requirements that GM has to meet or else Treasury might call its loan and force the General to face a bankruptcy Judge. There are two key terms of GM’s federal loan agreement that will definitely not be met.

First, the unions have to meet wage/benefit parity with the foreign transplant non-unionized work force. That’s a non-starter for the UAW. In fact, two hours after the bailout was announced, Ron Gettelfinger announced his itention to get the new Democratic President and Administration to amend that “unfair term.” Why would the union boss offer GM concessions that he seeks to overturn? He wouldn’t And won’t.

In any case, active UAW members’ direct wage and benefits are already close to parity with the transplant workers’. The important differences involve work rules, job classifications, and a telephone book’s worth of nonsense that makes union workers more unwieldy (read: costly) than transplant workers. The loan terms seek to sweep all of this away.

But UAW members believe they have the right to these job protections– even at the taxpayers’ expense. And if all those hundreds of pages of the union contract disappear, what’s the point in having a union? Legally, the UAW must put any changes to its existing GM contract to a member vote. Which it would lose. Unless, as always, there’s a quid pro quo.

The UAW (and its media supporters) likes to point to its “historic health care giveback”: the agreement placing GM retiree health care obligations into a union-run benefit association (a.k.a. VEBA). That little “concession” cost GM approximately $10b in cash. Of course, GM doesn’t have the cash, and never will– unless the American taxpayer antes up some more Benjamins. Meanwhile, The General already deferred its first payment (with interest accruing).

The Treasury Department inserted terms in the bail out loan agreements requiring the UAW to take stock in the new GM for half of the VEBA cash contribution owed. But it’s harder to skim stock than cash, and lots of stock won’t pay the medical bills coming due for retirees either. So the debt for equity swap is simply not going to happen.

The second key loan agreement term: a two-thirds debt-for-equity swap imposed on GM’s financial creditors. Nope.

If you add up the General’s debt liabilities (auto operating company related), the figure approaches $66b. Subrtact the Government’s bailout loan of $13.4b and the UAW VEBA liability of $10b (two creditors that want cash payment, not stock), and GM still carries $43b of debt.

Then there’s $7b in current debt (debt owed in less than a year), consisting of short term obligations and current portion of long term debt. The chance that short term creditors will take a long term position in General Motors is ludicrous. Especially when Uncle Sam is on the hook, and considering the Treasury Department’s cavalry rescue of GMAC.

That leaves long term debt of $36b comprised of various unsecured bonds of varying maturities, foreign currency denominated debt, bank debt, convertible debt (at strike prices that will never be seen again), and other debt-like items such as capitalized leases and muni bonds. Somehow, GM has to get approximately $25b of this grab bag of debt converted to equity.

Convincing these parties to agree to swap for debt for equity is impossible. There are various priority considerations, the fact that stock of a new GM might just be worthless, and that muni bond holders and lessors have zero interest in stock. Bank lenders with collateral, bond holders with near term due dates, and smart hedge fund owners of GM’s public debt will hold out until the very end.

There’s no chance to arrange any kind of equity exchange on reasonable grounds outside of bankruptcy court. It just ain’t gonna happen without that filing. We know it, the government knows it, and bankruptcy and reorganization experts know it. The only ones who don’t get it is GM itself.

“Inside sources at GM” have spent the last couple of days “suggesting” to the press that The General won’t need any more money beyond the $13.4b bailout from the Treasury (and another $6b for GMAC). GM CEO Rick Wagoner joined his union boss to make the announcement on TV this morning.

Sure, $20b in government money would be enough to buy the survival of GM (and GMAC)– provided U.S. auto sales hit the low end forecast (between 10.5 and 12.0m units) AND the other guys takes the hit. But no one will blink.

And even if GM doesn’t need more money, it’s still a basket case of a company run by the executives who dug the hole. There is only one solution: bankruptcy. Let’s get on with it already.

Ken Elias
Ken Elias

More by Ken Elias

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Npbheights Npbheights on Jan 09, 2009

    This is the car that Rick Wagoner should have driven to the bailout hearings. Check out the LICENSE PLATE! Very appropriate. www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-pI5YDzw4M&feature=related"

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Mar 31, 2009

    [...] wobei man hierbei aber klären muss, welche Schulden genau einen nun wirklich interessieren. Laut dieser Quelle sind es an Geldschulden insgesamt 66 Mrd. Dollar. AFAIK ist das für einen Automobilhersteller [...]

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next