Beware The Ides Of March: Nissan In Deep Kuso


In 1999, a French-Brazilian-Lebanese businessman saved a large Japanese automaker from certain bankruptcy. Since then, Carlos Ghosn, cost cutter extraordinaire, wears the dual crowns of the presidency of Renault and Nissan. The Japanese crown is turning into a very heavy burden. According to Tokyo’s Nikkei (sub), Carlos Ghosn, “is facing an even more daunting challenge of securing profits amid the yen’s rise and the deep economic downturn. Ghosn acknowledges that the external environment facing Nissan is far more bleak than in 1999, when Nissan was trying to rise above damages that were largely self-inflicted.” Fixer Ghosn is softening the blow for the announcement that he can mend self-inflicted wounds. But he isn’t godlike – yet – to save Nissan from external damnation. Nissan appears to be in deep, deep kuso. Ghosn is fighting two armies of windmills:
A worldwide plunge in sales caused by the financial crisis, and the yen’s advance against other currencies. Ghosn has no other choices than to improve short-term earnings by mortgaging Nissan’s future: Plans for new factories are being scrapped; budgets for development projects are being cut. Two sacred cows are being turned into Kobe beef.
Sacred cow three: Nissan is set to move production of its March subcompact to a factory in Thailand. Japanese automakers moved production overseas when the yen was strong in the 1990s, but this mainly covered vehicles for export. Domestic production was maintained to keep jobs and technologies in Japan. Says the Nikkei: “But with domestic sales declining, it has become difficult for Nissan to develop vehicles exclusively for the domestic market. The decision to turn the March subcompact into a global vehicle and to produce it in Thailand marks an end to the automaker’s long-standing practice of making cars for the domestic market at home.”
When the March is due for a full remodeling in 2010, Nissan will stop production in Japan and import all units for the domestic market from Thailand.
According to the Nikkei, “the redesigned March, to be sold in Japan and emerging markets in Asia, will use a chassis developed with French partner Renault SA. Production costs for the car will be cut by about 30 percent by procuring more parts locally — about 90% — in addition to using a common chassis.”
A whole slaughterhouse of sacred cows is likely to follow. It’s either that, or certain bankruptcy again.
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
- Scott "It may not be the ideal hauler to take the clan cross-country to Wally World considering range anxiety "Range Anxiety is a chosen term that conceals as much as it discloses. You don't care about range that much if you can recharge quickly and current BV's (battery vehicles) can't, no matter how good the chargers are. From what I've been reading it is likely that within 5 years there will be batteries in cars, most likely Tesla's, that can charge fast enough with no harm to the batteries to satisfy all of us with no need to increase range beyond a real world 300-ish miles.And that's when I buy one.
- Charles I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van
- Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
- Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
Comments
Join the conversation
Maybe Michael Karesh could report on the CVT thing, since he is in a good postion to do so. Similar to what I said on the European euthanizing thread, you really think the Jap gov is going to let anybody go down? Seriously? On C. Ghosn, his time's up. You cant cost cut your way to prosperity eternally. He did a fine job the first moment, but he's long outlived his welcome or use. His "magical" wielding of the cost-cutting scissors by now is causing Nissan more damage than good. Good riddance Mr Ghosn! Go enjoy your multi-million retirement somewhere. Please.
With CVTs reliability isn't the issue for me. Repairability is the issue. At the current time my understanding is that Nissan CVTs either cannot be repaired in the field or Nissan will not repair them in the field. That means you get a reman or new transmission when yours fails. I believe the current price for R/R when out of warranty is in the range of $5,000 - $6,000. The last time I had a standard auto transmission rebuilt (2006)the cost for parts and labor was $1600.