Bailout Watch 366: Hertz, Avis, Dollar Thrifty Line Up For Bailout Billions

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

What’s the opposite of reductio ad absurdum? Whatever it is, that’s what we’re looking at, as Bailout Nation (hat tip to Daniel Howes) continues to expand. The Wall Street Journal reports that the rental car giants are putting in their bid to dine at the multi-billion dollar bailout buffet. “Avis Budget Group Inc., Hertz Global Holdings Inc. and other rental-car companies are lobbying Congress to allow them to use Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to finance new auto purchases. The House of Representatives included a clause in a TARP reform bill that it passed last week to give the government authority to back loans to rental-car companies and other fleet purchasers. The bill has now moved on to the Senate.” So rental car companies AND fleet purchasers get low-interest federal loans (a.k.a. free money)? Hey, I own two cars! Is that a fleet? Trust me: they’re deeply troubled assets. Where’s my bailout? I know! Let’s ask Barney Frank!

“If our desire is to get car buying and credit flowing again, enabling people who buy hundreds of cars at a time is a good way to do it,” said Steven Adamske, a spokesman for Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

Damn! Hundreds! Oh well. OK then, what the Hell will making it easier for rental car companies to buy cars do to get more people renting cars? I mean, that IS where their revenue comes from, yes? Yes. But that’s besides the point, apparently.

“Still, the companies say it would bring significant relief. Access to fresh capital would help grease overall auto sales and purchases, they contend. ‘The whole system needs to get moving again,’ says Pat Farrell, a spokesman for privately held Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., which also operates the National and Alamo brands.”

At the risk of over-simplifying this situation, it’s bat shit crazy.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Jan 30, 2009

    And President Obamarx signed legislation to "level the playing field" for organized labor today. I don't think he is aware of which side was in the drivers seat. [s]God[/s][s] Lenin Bless the USSA! Bunter[/s]

  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Jan 30, 2009

    Ooops. Botched the strike Through. Lenin bless the USSA!

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next