You Go To War With The Neighborhood Electric Vehicle You Have, Not The Neighborhood Electric Vehicle You Want

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

From Defense News comes word that the United States Army is purchasing 4,000 neighborhood electric vehicles(NEVs) for use as on-base transport. Six of Chrysler’s Global Electric Motors (GEM) NEVs were delivered in a ceremony at Fort Meyer which was probably intended to highlight the army’s long-term efficiency goals. But something must have been lost in the bureaucratic translation. “We hope by showing the rest of the country what we can do with electric vehicles we can potentially drive the technology and the market, including the Chevy Volt [and] the Tesla that are out there now, and show a greater demand,” said Paul Bollinger, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Energy and Partnerships. I’m sorry sir, but what does the military have to do with a car that doesn’t exist and a $100k sportstoy? The NEVs probably make a lot of sense for on-base, especially if they can give it a sweet military nickname to wipe out memories of the cutesy GEM moniker. But seriously, Volt and Tesla? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? Once the military reaches for its wallet though, there’s no knowing what might happen.

The army is serious about energy efficiency for a vast number of reasons. But according to Bollinger, “it is all about the battery technology.” And the specter of “foreign battery dependence” has clearly troubled the professionally paranoid. “One of the things we are looking at in the Army and spending millions of dollars on is enhancing battery technology not only for our vehicles but for our installations. If we put large amounts of renewable energy on our installations, be it solar or wind, it needs to be able to store that power when the sun is not up or the wind is not blowing.”

And by “spending millions,” he means that the military is (among other things) holding an EV contest. “A notice of intent to lease is on the street now. GSA [General Services Administration] will take all the responses and make a selection. We hope to have vehicles no later than April,” says Bollinger. “This is the first part of showing the industry that we are serious about electric vehicles and that we are going to buy more.” And probably not from BYD. No word on who is applying, but one imagines that few things would be more welcome in Detroit right now than a nice big military contract.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Srynerson Srynerson on Jan 15, 2009
    “We hope by showing the rest of the country what we can do with electric vehicles we can potentially drive the technology and the market, including the Chevy Volt [and] the Tesla that are out there now, and show a greater demand,” said Paul Bollinger, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Energy and Partnerships. The military's doing product placements now? I wonder how many NASCAR-type stickers you could fit on an aircraft carrier.
  • Threeer Threeer on Jan 15, 2009

    Echo the fact that these make sense on base as utility vehicles. On most of the bases that I was assigned to, I could ride my bicycle faster than most cars could drive! And if it cuts down on fuel consumption, why not? Who says that all of the maintenance folk or service groups need to drive trucks? I'd be happy to be assigned one of these little buggers for light duty around base.

  • ToolGuy "Nothing is greater than the original. Same goes for original Ford Parts. They’re the parts we built to build your Ford. Anything else is imitation."
  • Slavuta I don't know how they calc this. My newest cars are 2017 and 2019, 40 and 45K. Both needed tires at 30K+, OEM tires are now don't last too long. This is $1000 in average (may be less). Brakes DYI, filters, oil, wipers. I would say, under $1500 under 45K miles. But with the new tires that will last 60K, new brakes, this sum could be less in the next 40K miles.
  • BeauCharles I had a 2010 Sportback GTS for 10 years. Most reliable car I ever own. Never once needed to use that super long warranty - nothing ever went wrong. Regular maintenance and tires was all I did. It's styling was great too. Even after all those years it looked better than many current models. Biggest gripe I had was the interior. Cheap (but durable) materials and no sound insulation to speak of. If Mitsubishi had addressed those items I'm sure it would have sold better.
  • Marty S I learned to drive on a Crosley. Also, I had a brand new 75 Buick Riviera and the doors were huge. Bent the inside edge of the hood when opening it while the passenger door was open. Pretty poor assembly quality.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Alan, I was an Apache pilot and after my second back surgery I was medically boarded off of flying status due to vibrations, climbing on and off aircraft, so I was given the choice of getting out or re-branching so I switched to Military Intel. Yes your right if you can’t perform your out doesn’t matter if your at 17 years. Dad always said your just a number, he was a retired command master chief 25 years.
Next